Cited by 41Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyWorkplace Spirituality and LeadershipHealth, psychology, and well-being

The role of the spiritual dimension of the self as the prime determinant of health

Faull, K., Hills, M. D.·2006·Disability and Rehabilitation

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present a clinical commentary on the relationship of spirituality to healthcare for those with chronic physical conditions. METHOD: A spiritually based theory of self-identity was presented, based on selected literature to identify the process of health attainment for those with chronic conditions. The resultant Health Change Process Theory was then discussed in relation to relevant empirical research and the implications for rehabilitation practice were outlined. RESULTS: The development of a resilient, intrinsic, spiritually based concept of self was found to be pivotal to health outcomes in rehabilitation. This was then incorporated within a Health Change Process Theory to explain and predict the course followed by people with chronic disorders to achieve health. CONCLUSION: The Health Change Process Theory provides an inclusive framework within which acute and chronic rehabilitation healthcare can be merged to maximise health outcomes. Nevertheless, a need remains to develop a quantitative measure of individual holistic health, based on this theory, to facilitate its use in rehabilitation practice. This paper forwards an explanation for the process that people experiencing chronic physical disabilities undergo as they achieve health. A concept of self that identifies the spiritual core as the component that determines the constancy and continuity of self as a whole which is necessary for health is presented as the basis of the rehabilitative health process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09638280500265946

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Faull, K., & Hills, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Rotorua Hospital (NZ)
  • University of Waikato (NZ)
Corresponding author
Hills, M. D.
Venue
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2006-01
Volume
28
Issue
11
Pages
729-740
ISSN
  • 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5165
OpenAlex
W2130618908
Cited by
41
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Disability and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
Keywords
spirituality, self-identity, chronic physical illness, rehabilitation, holistic health, spiritual resilience, chronic physical disability
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Chronic Disease, Health, Humans, Self Concept, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review