The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploratory findings with virtual reality for phantom limb pain; from stump motion to agency and analgesia
Abstract
PURPOSE: Phantom limb pain is chronic and intractable. Recently, virtual reality (VR) and motion capture technology has replicated the mirror box device of Ramachandran (Ramachandran et al. Nature 1995, 377, 489-490; Ramachandran and Rogers-Ramachandran Proc R Soc Biol Sci 1996, 263, 377-386) and led to reductions in this pain. We present results from a novel variation on this method which captures motion data directly from a patient's stump (rather than using the opposite remaining limb) and then transforms it into goal directed, virtual action enacted by an avatar in a VR environment. METHOD: A sample of subjects with 'arm' (n = 7) and 'leg' (n = 7) amputations underwent trials of a virtual reality (VR) system, controlled by motion captured from their stump which was translated into movements of a virtual limb within the VR environment. Measures of pain in the phantom limb were elicited from patients before and during this exercise as they attempted to gain agency for the movement they saw, and feel embodied within the limb. After this each subject was interviewed about their experiences. RESULTS: Five subjects in each group felt the virtual limb to be moved by them and felt sensations of movement within it. With this they also reported reductions in their phantom limb pain greater than expected from distraction alone. No carry over effect was seen. CONCLUSIONS: This technique, which has shown similar success rates to trials of a virtual mirror box, is relatively cheap and portable, and will allow further trials in a home environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors
(1996) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1996.0058 · Cited by 1,246
Cited by
Virtual reality in neuroscience research and therapy
Bohil, C. J., Alicea, B., & Biocca, F. A. (2011) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3122 · Cited by 1,108
Embodiment, ownership and disownership
de Vignemont, F. (2011) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.004 · Cited by 484
Postamputation pain: epidemiology, mechanisms, and treatment
Cohen, S., & Hsu (2013) · Journal of Pain Research · doi:10.2147/jpr.s32299 · Cited by 372
Matheve, T., Bogaerts, K., & Timmermans, A. (2020) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-020-00688-0 · Cited by 118
Seeing and identifying with a virtual body decreases pain perception
Hänsell, A., Lenggenhagerl, B., von Känell, R., Curatolol, M., & Blankel, O. (2011) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.03.013 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Cole, J., Crowle, S., Austwick, G., & Henderson Slater, D.
- Venue
- Disability and Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 846-854
- ISSN
- 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5165
- OpenAlex
- W1981136187
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploratory findings with virtual reality for phantom limb pain; from stump motion to agency and analgesia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09638280802355197
- The paper
- Cole, J., Crowle, S., Austwick, G., & Henderson Slater, D. (2009). Exploratory findings with virtual reality for phantom limb pain; from stump motion to agency and analgesia. Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280802355197
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.