Cited by 20Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adding a subjective dimension to an ICF-based disability measure for people with multiple sclerosis: development and use of a measure for perception of disabilities

Wynia, Klaske, Middel, Berrie, de Ruiter, Han, van Dijk, Jitse P., Lok, Willem S., de Keyser, Jacques H. A., Reijneveld, Sijmen A.·2009·Disability and Rehabilitation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The subjective dimension of disability, the perception of disability, is a dimension missing from the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), and from health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments. However, it is a highly relevant dimension for clinical practice as perceived disability may identify care needs. We therefore developed a measure for this subjective dimension of disability in multiple sclerosis (MS) and examined the contribution of this dimension to QOL. METHOD: A measure named the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Profile-Disability Perception (MSIP-DP) was developed to reflect a person's perception of disabilities reported using the original MSIP-disability (MSIP-D) items. MS patients (n=530) completed both MSIP sections, the medical outcome study short form questionnaire (SF-36), the World Health Organisation Quality Of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) and questions concerning disease severity. The contribution of disability perception (DP) to QOL in MS was estimated using hierarchical multiple regression analyses after controlling for MS severity. RESULTS: Confirmative factor analysis confirmed the hypothesised disability perception domains that correspond with the related disability domains in the MSIP. DP scales yielded sufficient reliability. DP explained a unique and substantial part of the variance in QOL, particularly the perception of impairments in mental functions. DISCUSSION: Results indicated that the subjective dimension of functioning and health operationalised in the MSIP-DP is a relevant concept in explaining QOL in MS. In clinical practice psychological interventions addressing a patient's perception of disability, particularly of impairments in mental functioning, may contribute to QOL.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09638280802509488

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Treatment effects concerning QoL in MS are best evaluated using the WHOQOL-BREF, although there is not a norm group specific for MS patients.

    “Treatment effects concerning QoL in MS are best evaluated using the WHOQOL-BREF, although there is not a norm group specific for MS patients.31”

    From EMDR treatment for anxiety in MS patients: A pilot study (2020) · cites this paper as [31]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Olek M J, 2002, Neurology in clinical practice3rd ed, 2
  2. Schermelleh-Engel K, 2005, Meth Psychol Res Online, 8, 23
  3. Nunnally J C, 1994, Psychometric theory3rd ed

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wynia, K., Middel, B., de Ruiter, H., van Dijk, J. P., Lok, W. S., de Keyser, J. H. A., & Reijneveld, S. A.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Wynia, Klaske
Venue
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2009-01
Volume
31
Issue
12
Pages
1008-1017
ISSN
  • 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5165
OpenAlex
W1998880417
Cited by
20
References
24
Citations by year
2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Disability and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, perceptions of disability, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, health-related quality of life, disease severity, psychological intervention
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review