Cited by 18Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryMedication Adherence and ComplianceMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Understanding the facilitators and barriers of stroke survivors’ adherence to recovery-oriented self-practice: a thematic synthesis

Open access
Vadas, Dor, Prest, Kirsten, Turk, Amadea, Tierney, Stephanie·2022·Disability and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Purpose Stroke survivors receive considerable rehabilitation efforts as inpatients, but one-on-one therapy decreases after discharge. The gap between the amount of required therapy and the lack of its availability in this phase of care may be partly overcome by self-practice. However, patient's adherence to prescribed programs is often low. While single studies have examined factors affecting adherence in this specific case, they have not been reviewed and synthesised previously. Methods A thematic synthesis of qualitative studies explored factors affecting stroke survivors' adherence to prescribed, recovery-oriented self-practice. Five databases were systematically searched for references: Medline, Psycinfo, CINAHL, Embase, and ASSIA. Quality assessment was undertaken using the CASP tool. Results From 1308 references, 68 potential papers were read in full, and 12 were included in the review. An overarching theme was identified as: "Tailoring and personalization rather than standardization." It was informed by the following three analytical themes: "The meaning of 'self' in self-practice," "Identifying self-practice as a team effort," and "Self-practice that is grounded in one's reality." Conclusion To have a positive effect on adherence to self-practice, clinicians are advised to spend time learning about each individual's life circumstances, so they can tailor proposed exercise programs to patients' personal situations, preferences, and needs.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09638288.2021.1968512

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vadas, D., Prest, K., Turk, A., & Tierney, S.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Vadas, Dor
Venue
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2021-08-30
Volume
44
Issue
22
Pages
6608-6619
ISSN
  • 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5165
OpenAlex
W3197350405
Cited by
18
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Disability and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
stroke rehabilitation, self-practice, exercise adherence, post-discharge rehabilitation, personalized rehabilitation, patient preferences, barriers to adherence, facilitators of adherence, COVID-19 pandemic, telerehabilitation
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, COVID-19, Aftercare, Humans, Patient Discharge, Survivors, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review