Cited by 20Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryPhysical Activity and HealthBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

Feasibility of ActivABLES to promote home-based exercise and physical activity of community-dwelling stroke survivors with support from caregivers: A mixed methods study

Open access
Olafsdottir, Steinunn A., Jonsdottir, Helga, Bjartmarz, Ingibjörg, Magnusson, Charlotte, Caltenco, Héctor, Kytö, Mikko, Maye, Laura, McGookin, David +3 more·2020·BMC Health Services Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Technical applications can promote home-based exercise and physical activity of community-dwelling stroke survivors. Caregivers are often able and willing to assist with home-based exercise and physical activity but lack the knowledge and resources to do so. ActivABLES was established to promote home-based exercise and physical activity among community-dwelling stroke survivors, with support from their caregivers. The aim of our study is to investigate the feasibility of ActivABLES in terms of acceptability, demand, implementation and practicality. Methods: A convergent design of mixed methods research in which quantitative results were combined with personal experiences of a four-week use of ActivABLES by community-dwelling stroke survivors with support from their caregivers. Data collection before, during and after the four-week period included the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) and Five Times Sit to Stand Test (5xSST) and data from motion detectors. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with stroke survivors and caregivers after the four-week period. Descriptive statistics were used for quantitative data. Qualitative data was analysed with direct content analysis. Themes were identified related to the domains of feasibility: acceptability, demand, implementation and practicality. Data was integrated by examining any (dis)congruence in the quantitative and qualitative findings. Results: Ten stroke survivors aged 55–79 years participated with their informal caregivers. Functional improvements were shown in BBS (+ 2.5), ABC (+ 0.9), TUG (− 4.2) and 5xSST (− 2.7). More physical activity was detected with motion detectors (stand up/sit down + 2, number of steps + 227, standing + 0.3 h, hours sitting/lying − 0.3 h). The qualitative interviews identified themes for each feasibility domain: (i) acceptability: appreciation, functional improvements, self-initiated activities and expressed potential for future stroke survivors ; (2) demand: reported use, interest in further use and need for follow-up; (3) implementation: importance of feedback, variety of exercises and progression of exercises and (4) practicality: need for support and technical problems. The quantitative and qualitative findings converged well with each other and supported the feasibility of ActivABLES. Conclusions: ActivABLES is feasible and can be a good asset for stroke survivors with slight or moderate disability to use in their homes. Further studies are needed with larger samples.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12913-020-05432-x

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 101 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olafsdottir, S. A., Jonsdottir, H., Bjartmarz, I., Magnusson, C., Caltenco, H., Kytö, M., Maye, L., McGookin, D., Arnadottir, S. A., Hjaltadottir, I., & Hafsteinsdottir, T. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Iceland (IS)
  • National University Hospital of Iceland (IS)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Aalto University (FI)
Corresponding author
Olafsdottir, Steinunn A.
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2020-06-22
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
562-562
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3036797731
Cited by
20
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Opin vísindi (Opin vísindi) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Hirsla (Landspítali University Hospital) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • NordForsk (Activables)
  • The Icelandic Centre of Research (190634-051)
  • The Icelandic Physiotherapy Association
  • The Icelandic Ministry of Welfare
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
stroke survivors, home-based exercise, physical activity, caregiver support, feasibility, acceptability, implementation, practicality, balance, gait, motion sensors, wearable sensors, community-dwelling stroke survivors, informal caregivers, exercise feedback, exercise progression, technology-assisted rehabilitation, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go test, Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Aged, Exercise Therapy, Feasibility Studies, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Home Care Services, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Social Support, Caregivers, Survivors, Qualitative Research, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review