Stormwater management and urban planning: Lessons from 40 years of innovation
Abstract
Urban planning is widely advocated as an important way to encourage the more sustainable management of urban stormwater, using alternatives to piped systems. This paper explores the way in which Swedish water professionals have opportunities to influence stormwater planning and the barriers that limit their participation in this process. Empirical evidence has been obtained from in-depth semi-structured interviews with urban water professionals from nine Swedish municipalities. The paper shows that there is a perception of the legal requirements related to the provision of drainage services that inhibits the utilisation of non-piped solutions. There are also reservations about a dichotomy that inhibits actions – is stormwater an issue for the planning department or for the water department? It is concluded that water professionals have unique opportunities to integrate stormwater management approaches within wider urban planning practice and, hence, are able to encourage the use of alternative systems that are more sustainable than using traditional pipes or sewers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ditches, pipes, swales, and large dry or wet detention basins, when installed by developers during construction, are relatively low cost and dependable approaches for reducing flooding issues that impact people and property.
“Ditches, pipes, swales, and large dry or wet detention basins, when installed by developers during construction, are relatively low cost and dependable approaches for reducing flooding issues that impact people and property (Collins et al. 2010;Brown 2013;Cettner et al. 2013;Hale 2016).”
From Phase II MS4 challenges: moving toward effective stormwater management for small municipalities (2022) · cites this paper as Cettner et al. 2013
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Green infrastructure for sustainable urban water management: Practices of five forerunner cities
Liu, L., & Jensen, M. B. (2018) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2017.11.013 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Phase II MS4 challenges: moving toward effective stormwater management for small municipalities
Rieck, L., Carson, C., Hawley, R. J., Heller, M., Paul, M., Scoggins, M., Zimmerman, M., & Smith, R. F. (2022) · Urban Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s11252-021-01179-3 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Volunteer science data show degraded water quality disproportionately burdens areas of high poverty
Horvath, I. R., Parolari, A. J., Petrella, S., Stow, C. A., Godwin, C. M., & Maguire, T. J. (2022) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128475 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cettner, A., Ashley, R., Viklander, M., & Nilsson, K.
- Affiliations
- Luleå University of Technology (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Cettner, Annicka
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 786-801
- ISSN
- 0964-0568 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0559
- OpenAlex
- W2048974622
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Planning and Management (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/I029346/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Integrated Water Resources Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Planning and Landscape Design
- Keywords
- urban stormwater management, urban planning, water professionals, professional participation, municipal water services, sustainable urban drainage systems, Swedish municipalities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review