Cited by 27Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsLocal Governance and PlanningIntegrated Water Resources Management

Managing stormwater for urban sustainability: an evaluation of local comprehensive plans in the Chesapeake Bay watershed region

Kim, Hyun Woo, Li, Ming-Han·2017·Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Abstract

This study uses a developed plan coding protocol in evaluating the quality of 76 comprehensive plans to examine whether local comprehensive plans have adequately integrated the concepts of sustainable stormwater management. The Chesapeake Bay watershed was chosen for the investigation because degraded stormwater runoff from nearby urban and suburban jurisdictions have critically polluted the watershed. The findings indicate that the majority of local governments have not sufficiently incorporated the sustainable stormwater management principles into their comprehensive plans. Five plan components (factual basis, goals and objectives, inter-organizational cooperation, policies, tools and strategies, and implementation) appear weak in realizing the concepts. The current study concludes by providing policy implications and recommendations to increase awareness and understanding of sustainable stormwater management concepts and to produce better implementation plans that integrate stormwater, ecosystem, and environmental planning comprehensively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09640568.2016.1251399

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Small-municipality (Phase II) MS4s frequently grapple with several challenges, resulting in a lack of stakeholder buy-in and actionable stormwater management plans.

    “However, small-municipality (Phase II) MS4s frequently grapple with several challenges, resulting in a lack of stakeholder buy-in and actionable stormwater management plans.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, H. W., & Li, M.-H.
Affiliations
Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Hyun Woo
Venue
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
Published
2016-11-10
Volume
60
Issue
10
Pages
1702-1725
ISSN
  • 0964-0568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0559
OpenAlex
W2556307654
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Planning and Management (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Local Governance and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Integrated Water Resources Management
Keywords
stormwater management, sustainable stormwater management, master plan, local government planning, Chesapeake Bay watershed, urban sustainability, stormwater pollution, inter-organizational cooperation, environmental planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review