The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transition tensions: mapping conflicts in movements for a just and sustainable transition
Abstract
The concept of a ‘just transition’ positions justice concerns of workers, front-line communities, and other marginalized groups at the center of sustainability efforts. However, related scholarship has largely neglected conflicts that arise between sustainability and justice goals. A framework is developed to identify three main tensions that planners and activists may encounter in efforts to advance a just transition. First, the ‘sustainability-inclusivity’ tension involves conflicts between rapid and bold policy action in time-sensitive contexts and inclusive governance processes. Second, the ‘sustainability-recognition’ tension involves conflicts between sustainability performance and recognition of diverse value systems and rights. Third, the ‘sustainability-equity’ tension involves conflicts between achieving sustainability performance and equitable distribution of benefits and burdens. Identifying and intentionally responding to such tensions is crucial to advance a just transition in the context of growing domestic and international inequality, the erosion of worker rights, and a warming climate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development
Elkington, J. (1994) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41165746 · Cited by 3,952
SEN, A. (2009) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvjnrv7n · Cited by 3,430
Redistribution or Recognition?: A Political-Philosophical Exchange
Fraser, N. W., Honneth, A., Golb, J. D., Ingram, J. D., & Wilke, C. (2003) · Cited by 3,426
Justice and the Politics of Difference
(2011) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvcm4g4q · Cited by 2,872
Framework convention on climate change
Venanzi, M. (1992) · Cited by 2,587
Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature
Schlosberg, D. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286294.001.0001 · Cited by 1,796
This changes everything: capitalism vs. the climate
(2015) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.191826 · Cited by 1,488
Energy justice: Conceptual insights and practical applications
Sovacool, B. K., & Dworkin, M. H. (2015) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.002 · Cited by 1,415
The political economy of the ‘just transition’
Newell, P., & Mulvaney, D. (2013) · The Geographical Journal · doi:10.1111/geoj.12008 · Cited by 1,285
Defining environmental justice : theories, movements, and nature
Schlosberg, D. (2007) · Cited by 1,284
Cited by
(2021) · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.101996 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Ciplet, D., & Harrison, J. L.
- Venue
- Environmental Politics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-03-31
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 435-456
- ISSN
- 0964-4016 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-8934
- OpenAlex
- W2928252825
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 23.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transition tensions: mapping conflicts in movements for a just and sustainable transition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09644016.2019.1595883
- The paper
- Ciplet, D., & Harrison, J. L. (2020). Transition tensions: mapping conflicts in movements for a just and sustainable transition. Environmental Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1595883
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.