The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature
Abstract
The basic task of this book is to explore what, exactly, is meant by ‘justice’ in definitions of environmental and ecological justice. It examines how the term is used in both self-described environmental justice movements and in theories of environmental and ecological justice. The central argument is that a theory and practice of environmental justice necessarily includes distributive conceptions of justice, but must also embrace notions of justice based in recognition, capabilities, and participation. Throughout, the goal is the development of a broad, multi-faceted, yet integrated notion of justice that can be applied to both relations regarding environmental risks in human populations and relations between human communities and non-human nature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Participation and Democratic Theory
Pateman, C. (1970) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511720444 · Cited by 6,159
Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach
Nussbaum, M. C. (2000) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511841286 · Cited by 6,103
Sen, A. (2005) · Journal of Human Development · doi:10.1080/14649880500120491 · Cited by 1,966
How science makes environmental controversies worse
Sarewitz, D. (2004) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001 · Cited by 1,194
Justice As Impartiality: A Treatise on Social Justice Volume II
Barry, B. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198279136.001.0001 · Cited by 1,026
Living between Water and Rocks: First Nations, Environmental Planning and Democracy
Borrows, J. (1997) · The University of Toronto Law Journal · doi:10.2307/825948 · Cited by 108
Cited by
Theorising environmental justice: The expanding sphere of a discourse
Schlosberg, D. (2013) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.755387 · Cited by 1,214
Self-citationRoadmap towards justice in urban climate adaptation research
Shi, L., Chu, E., Anguelovski, I., Aylett, A., Debats, J., Goh, K., Schenk, T., Seto, K. C., Dodman, D., Roberts, D., et al. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2841 · Cited by 656
Social equity in urban resilience planning
Meerow, S., Pajouhesh, P., & Miller, T. R. (2019) · Local Environment · doi:10.1080/13549839.2019.1645103 · Cited by 464
Cowell, R., Bristow, G., & Munday, M. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2010.521047 · Cited by 417
Anguelovski, I., Connolly, J. J., Garcia-Lamarca, M., Cole, H., & Pearsall, H. (2019) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132518803799 · Cited by 416
Metadata
- Authors
- Schlosberg, D.
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-05-01
- OpenAlex
- W2488167377
- Cited by
- 1,796
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 18.66
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286294.001.0001
- The paper
- Schlosberg, D. (2007). Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780199286294.001.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.