The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting Academic Performance by Data Mining Methods
Abstract
Academic failure among first‐year university students has long fuelled a large number of debates. Many educational psychologists have tried to understand and then explain it. Many statisticians have tried to foresee it. Our research aims to classify, as early in the academic year as possible, students into three groups: the ‘low‐risk’ students, who have a high probability of succeeding; the ‘medium‐risk’ students, who may succeed thanks to the measures taken by the university; and the ‘high‐risk’ students, who have a high probability of failing (or dropping out). This article describes our methodology and provides the most significant variables correlated to academic success among all the questions asked to 533 first‐year university students during November of academic year 2003/04. Finally, it presents the results of the application of discriminant analysis, neural networks, random forests and decision trees aimed at predicting those students' academic success.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Classification And Regression Trees
Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (2017) · doi:10.1201/9781315139470 · Cited by 11,417
Self-Motivation for Academic Attainment: The Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Personal Goal Setting
Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312029003663 · Cited by 1,724
Cited by
Yağcı, M. (2022) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-022-00192-z · Cited by 698
A Systematic Review on Educational Data Mining
Dutt, A., Ismail, M. A., & Herawan, T. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2654247 · Cited by 528
Huang, S., & Fang, N. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.015 · Cited by 373
A comparative analysis of machine learning techniques for student retention management
Delen, D. (2010) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.06.003 · Cited by 332
An early feedback prediction system for learners at-risk within a first-year higher education course
Baneres, D., Rodriguez, M. E., & Serra, M. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2019.2912167 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Vandamme, J. ‐., Meskens, N., & Superby, J. ‐.
- Venue
- Education Economics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 405-419
- ISSN
- 0964-5292 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5782
- OpenAlex
- W1988697879
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting Academic Performance by Data Mining Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09645290701409939
- The paper
- Vandamme, J. ‐., Meskens, N., & Superby, J. ‐. (2007). Predicting Academic Performance by Data Mining Methods. Education Economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645290701409939
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.