Cited by 64Memory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and MemoryMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice at short retention intervals

Rowland, Christopher A., DeLosh, Edward L.·2015·Memory

Abstract

The testing effect refers to the retention benefit conferred by prior retrieval of information from memory. Although the testing effect is a robust phenomenon, a common assumption is that reliable memory benefits only emerge after long retention intervals of days or weeks. The present study focused on potential test-induced retention benefits for brief retention intervals on the order of minutes and tens of seconds. Participants in four experiments studied lists of words. Some of the items were subjected to an initial cued recall test, and others were re-presented for additional study. Free recall tests were administered in each experiment following retention intervals ranging from 30 s to 8 min. When initial retrieval practice was successful (Experiments 1 through 3), or feedback compensated for unsuccessful retrieval (Experiment 4), significant testing effects emerged at all retention intervals. Results are discussed in the context of a bifurcated item-distribution model and highlight the importance of initial test performance and the type of analysis employed when examining testing effect data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09658211.2014.889710

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The level of success on the initial retrieval attempt is important in determining whether an advantage of retrieval practice will appear at short intervals.

    “Rowland & DeLosh (2015), however, demonstrate that the level of success on the initial retrieval attempt is important in in determining whether an advantage of retrieval practice will appear at short intervals.”

    From Practicing Retrieval Facilitates Learning (2021) · cites this paper as Rowland & DeLosh 2015

  • When performance on the initial test is low, there is an unfair advantage for the restudy condition because 100% of the items are restudied but only a small fraction of the items are successfully recalled on the initial test.

    “They suggest that when performance on the initial test is low, there is an unfair advantage for the restudy condition, such that 100% of the items are restudied but only a small fraction of the items are successfully recalled on the initial test.”

    From Practicing Retrieval Facilitates Learning (2021) · cites this paper as Rowland & DeLosh 2015

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 34 · Cited by 64

Authors
Rowland, C. A., & DeLosh, E. L.
Affiliations
Colorado State University (US)
Corresponding author
Rowland, Christopher A.
Venue
Memory
Published
2014-03-03
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
403-419
ISSN
  • 0965-8211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0686
OpenAlex
W1997433454
Cited by
64
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
testing effect, retrieval practice, retention interval, short-term memory, word lists, free recall, cued recall, feedback, memory retention
MeSH terms
Cues, Female, Humans, Male, Practice, Psychological, Psychomotor Performance, Mental Recall, Time Factors, Feedback, Psychological, Young Adult, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review