Cited by 11Memory Processes and InfluencesVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

A little can go a long way: giving learners some context can enhance the benefits of pretesting

Overoye, Acacia L., James, Kelsey K., Storm, Benjamin C.·2021·Memory

Abstract

Tests given to learners before they study new information can enhance the learning of that information. When responding to these pretests, learners typically generate answers that are incorrect but that are nevertheless helpful for improving the learning of the correct answers. The present research examined how providing learners with context prior to pretesting can enhance the benefits of pretesting. Across two experiments, participants were given a pretest for half of the to-be-learned information and then asked to read a passage about a fictional topic, an alien civilisation known as Yoffas (Experiment 1 and Experiment 2), or a unique fruit called the Anona (Experiment 2). Participants who read a short paragraph contextualising the to-be-learned information exhibited a significantly larger pretesting effect than participants who did not, with this interaction being observed regardless of whether memory was tested after a 5-min delay or 1-week delay, and regardless of whether contextualisation was manipulated between-subjects or within-subjects. These results suggest that what learners know prior to a pretest can have an impact on the extent to which learners benefit from that pretest.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09658211.2021.1974048

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mental model hypothesis predicts that learners should be able to activate some relevant prior knowledge to benefit from prequestions.

    “Rather, the mental model hypothesis predicts that learners should be able to activate some relevant prior knowledge to bene fi t from prequestions, which has been observed in past laboratory research (Carpenter, Haynes, et al., 2018; Overoye et al., 2021).”

    From ManyClasses 2: The effects of prequestions on media interactions and learning. (2026) · cites this paper as Overoye et al., 2021

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Overoye, A. L., James, K. K., & Storm, B. C.
Affiliations
  • Utah Valley University (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Corresponding author
Overoye, Acacia L.
Venue
Memory
Published
2021-09-06
Volume
29
Issue
9
Pages
1206-1215
ISSN
  • 0965-8211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0686
OpenAlex
W3197656171
Cited by
11
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
pretesting, prior knowledge, context effects, learning from mistakes, memory retention, delayed recall
MeSH terms
Educational Measurement, Humans, Learning, Reading, Emigrants and Immigrants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review