A little can go a long way: giving learners some context can enhance the benefits of pretesting
Abstract
Tests given to learners before they study new information can enhance the learning of that information. When responding to these pretests, learners typically generate answers that are incorrect but that are nevertheless helpful for improving the learning of the correct answers. The present research examined how providing learners with context prior to pretesting can enhance the benefits of pretesting. Across two experiments, participants were given a pretest for half of the to-be-learned information and then asked to read a passage about a fictional topic, an alien civilisation known as Yoffas (Experiment 1 and Experiment 2), or a unique fruit called the Anona (Experiment 2). Participants who read a short paragraph contextualising the to-be-learned information exhibited a significantly larger pretesting effect than participants who did not, with this interaction being observed regardless of whether memory was tested after a 5-min delay or 1-week delay, and regardless of whether contextualisation was manipulated between-subjects or within-subjects. These results suggest that what learners know prior to a pretest can have an impact on the extent to which learners benefit from that pretest.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The mental model hypothesis predicts that learners should be able to activate some relevant prior knowledge to benefit from prequestions.
“Rather, the mental model hypothesis predicts that learners should be able to activate some relevant prior knowledge to bene fi t from prequestions, which has been observed in past laboratory research (Carpenter, Haynes, et al., 2018; Overoye et al., 2021).”
From ManyClasses 2: The effects of prequestions on media interactions and learning. (2026) · cites this paper as Overoye et al., 2021
Cites
When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding?
Grimaldi, P. J., & Karpicke, J. D. (2012) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0174-0 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
The Effect of Relevance Instructions on Reading Time and Learning.
McCrudden, M. T., Schraw, G., & Kambe, G. (2005) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.88 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
The effect of prequestions on learning from video presentations.
Carpenter, S. K., & Toftness, A. R. (2017) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.07.014 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
The limited effects of prequestions on learning from authentic lecture videos
Toftness, A. R., Carpenter, S. K., Lauber, S., & Mickes, L. (2018) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.06.003 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pan, S. C., & Carpenter, S. K. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09814-5 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
ManyClasses 2: The effects of prequestions on media interactions and learning.
Motz, B. A., Chinni, A., de Leeuw, J. R., Jankowski, H. E., Aggarwal, A., Amato, M., Berlin, K., Britten, K., Brown, A., Cerchiaro, M. L., et al. (2026) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000978 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Overoye, A. L., James, K. K., & Storm, B. C.
- Affiliations
- Utah Valley University (US)
- University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
- Corresponding author
- Overoye, Acacia L.
- ORCID
- Storm, Benjamin C.
- Venue
- Memory
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-09-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1206-1215
- ISSN
- 0965-8211 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0686
- OpenAlex
- W3197656171
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 0.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Memory (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- pretesting, prior knowledge, context effects, learning from mistakes, memory retention, delayed recall
- MeSH terms
- Educational Measurement, Humans, Learning, Reading, Emigrants and Immigrants
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review