CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationPolitical Theory and DemocracyPolitical Conflict and Governance

Guardians of trust: foreign election interference and the institutional logics of democratic resilience among Swedish county governors

Open access
Ördén, Hedvig, Isaksson, Elsa, Smedberg, Martina·2026·European Security
DOI 10.1080/09662839.2026.2615956
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Democratic resilience has emerged as a central theme in academic debates in response to growing threats to contemporary democracies, yet little attention has been paid to resilience capacity to external stressors. This article conceptualises electoral integrity as a key democratic resilience capacity and examines how central actors in the Swedish electoral administration make sense of, and navigate, foreign election interference. Drawing on institutional logics theory and qualitative interviews with Swedish county governors, the article demonstrates how governors approach resilience through a logic of trust: interviewees view trust as both a core democratic resource and a target of foreign adversaries. Assuming the role of guardians of trust, governors rely on institutional practices of transparency, impartiality and standardisation as central tools. By positioning foreign election interference as a key external stressor and electoral integrity as a resilience capacity, the article contributes to the growing literature on democratic resilience. By providing insight into the work of the electoral administration, it also adds a novel resilience perspective to security studies scholarship on foreign interference. Finally, the article indicates a need for future comparative studies on electoral integrity as a resilience capacity in the context of external stressors across settings with diverging levels of trust.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09662839.2026.2615956

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Ördén, H., Isaksson, E., & Smedberg, M.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Ördén, Hedvig
ORCID
Venue
European Security
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2026-02-04
Pages
1-21
ISSN
  • 0966-2839 (ISSN-L)
  • 1746-1545
DOI
10.1080/09662839.2026.2615956
OpenAlex
W7128045327
Cited by
2
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
39.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • European Security (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Lunds Universitet
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
Keywords
democratic resilience, electoral integrity, county governors, institutional logics, trust, external stressors, transparency, impartiality, standardization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review