Landscapes of (neo-)liberal control: the transcarceral spaces of federally sentenced women in Canada
Abstract
This article maps the racializing, classing and gendering cartographies of cross-spatial marginalization and social control experienced by women who were formerly federally incarcerated in Canada. By investigating women's criminalization, prison and post-prison experiences, this article traces practices of racialization, gendering and classing that underwrite liberal to neo-liberal forms of social control. Results from 68 interviews with women released from federal prisons in Canada show that women's criminalization cannot solely be traced to shifts from liberal to neo-liberal governance, but rather to the ways in which structures of oppression have influenced women's criminalization across liberal to neo-liberal rationalities. This analysis shows how liberal ‘welfarist’ ideas and ideals are embedded in neo-liberal reforms and provide the discursive platforms of an extended and widened network of social control of criminalized women beyond prison walls, across institutions, including a variety of (non-)government actors and the women themselves. This widened web of (neo-)liberal social control constitutes practices that have formed carceral spaces beyond prison walls and have perpetuated and exacerbated women's marginality after their release from federal prisons in Canada.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Insufficient public investment includes rolling back welfare, education, and healthcare programs and creeping privatization that puts conditions of thriving out of reach for those who lack affluence.
“Insufficient public investment looks like the rolling back of welfare, education, and healthcare programs, along with creeping privatization that puts conditions of thriving out of reach for those who lack affluence (Allspach, 2010; Peck, 2003).”
From Huronia’s lessons: how ableist violence determines health (2025) · cites this paper as Allspach, 2010
Cites
Looking White People in the Eye
Razack, S. (1998) · doi:10.3138/9781442670204 · Cited by 521 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Conceptualizing the carceral in carceral geography
Moran, D., Turner, J., & Schliehe, A. K. (2018) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132517710352 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Huronia’s lessons: how ableist violence determines health
Rinaldi, J. (2025) · Handbook on the Social Determinants of Health · doi:10.4337/9781035302093.00020
- Authors
- Allspach, A.
- Affiliations
- York University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Allspach, Anke
- Venue
- Gender, Place & Culture
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-11-06
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 705-723
- ISSN
- 0966-369X (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0524
- OpenAlex
- W2064864360
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 8.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gender Place & Culture (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- York University
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
- Keywords
- women prisoners, federal prisons, social control, neoliberalism, liberal governance, racialization, gendering, criminalization of women, carceral state, marginalization, Canada
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review