Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 81Geographies of human-animal interactionsAnimal Law and WelfareDiverse Aspects of Tourism Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global regulations and local practices: the politics and governance of animal welfare in elephant tourism

Duffy, Rosaleen, Moore, Lorraine·2011·Journal of Sustainable Tourism
DOI 10.1080/09669582.2011.566927
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper examines challenges associated with global regulation of the tourism industry via an analysis of the use of elephants for trekking and safaris in Thailand and Botswana. It highlights inherent problems in applying universal principles in diverse locations; it unpicks the North–South power dynamics involved in drawing up global standards for elephant welfare in tourism. The development and expansion of elephant riding raise important ethical issues around questions of animal welfare, especially definitions of acceptable and appropriate standards for working animals. This paper uses a political economy approach to understandings of global governance to analyse who has the power to govern, at what scale and with what effects. It examines the role of animal welfare NGOs as key epistemic communities shaping the debate on elephant welfare. It discusses the highly variable practices of working with elephants in Botswana and in Thailand. It concludes that attempts at global regulation need to seriously engage with local level practices if global standards are to be workable and acceptable for tour operators, animal welfare NGOs, elephant camp owners and tourists alike. It raises leading global governance issues and discussions of the role of NGOs in governance, in general.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09669582.2011.566927

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Abu Camp, Abu camp
  2. African Conservation Foundation, Linking people and conservation
  3. Anantara, Golden triangle
  4. Bentrupperbäumer J., 2005, Wildlife tourism, 82
  5. Born Free Foundation, About us
  6. Born Free Foundation, Asian elephants
  7. Born Free Foundation, Circuses and performing animals
  8. Born Free Foundation, Corporpate sponsorship–Thomson Airways
  9. Born Free Foundation, Corporate sponsorship Kuoni
  10. Chiang Do, Chiang Dao
  11. EMOA, Elephant managers and owners association
  12. Evans K., Elephant research
  13. Government of South Africa, 2008, National norms and standards for the management of elephants in South Africa
  14. HSUS, 2008, The HSUS/HSI applauds new regulations on elephant management in South Africa, warns against culling
  15. HSUS, About us
  16. HSUS, Accomplishments
  17. IFAW, 2006, Deadly elephant safari tourism under fire
  18. IFAW, 2006, Elephants taken from the wild in Zimbabwe for tourism trade
  19. IFAW, 2008, South Africa slams the door on elephant tourism, NGOs rejoice
  20. IFAW, Who we are
  21. IFAW, Save the world's remaining elephants
  22. Kontogeorgopoulos N., 2009, Journal of Tourism, 10, 1
  23. LWE, Living with elephants
  24. LWE, Living with elephants project
  25. Mae Sa Elephant Camp, Mae Sa elephant camp
  26. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 2003, Thailand's facts and truths about PETA's video footage and elephants in Thailand, Ministry of Foreign Affairs
  27. PETA, Animals are not ours to use for entertainment
  28. PETA, Urge Thailand to stop elephant torture
  29. PETA, Torture of baby elephants in Thailand
  30. Sanctuary Lodges, Sanctuary lodges
  31. Sanctuary Retreats, Botswana
  32. TAT, Amazing Thailand campaign
  33. TAT, Tourism Thailand
  34. TECC, Thai Elephant Conservation Center
  35. The Times, 2002, Thais say elephant torture video is false
  36. TUI, Corporate profile
  37. Wilderness Safaris, Abu camp

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Duffy, R., & Moore, L.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
ORCID
Duffy, Rosaleen
Venue
Journal of Sustainable Tourism
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2011-05
Volume
19
Issue
4-5
Pages
589-604
ISSN
  • 0966-9582 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-7646
DOI
10.1080/09669582.2011.566927
OpenAlex
W2140725745
Cited by
81
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
24.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sustainable Tourism (publishedVersion)
  • SOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geographies of human-animal interactions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Animal Law and Welfare
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Keywords
elephant welfare, elephant tourism, global governance, global regulation, animal welfare standards, North-South power relations, epistemic communities, working animals, political economy of tourism, Thailand, Botswana, local practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.