Cited by 7Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesCriminal Law and PolicyHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk

The challenge to UK drug policy

McKeganey, Neil·2007·Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy

Abstract

Drug policy within the UK has been challenged to a greater degree in the last twelve months than at any time over the last ten years. That challenge consists of reports from the Royal Society of Arts and the UK Drug Policy Commission as well as empirical research on the classification of drugs within the Misuse of Drugs Act. These documents identify major weaknesses in the content, direction and delivery of UK drug policy and propose a new direction of policy and new elements of drug policy. In the case of the RSA report and the report from the UK Drug Policy Commission the principal recommendation is for drug policy to shift from its current tri-partite focus on treatment, prevention and education to focus first and foremost on reducing drug-related harm. This paper critically considers the assessment of drug policy set out within these reports and looks at the possible impact of a drug policy that prioritized harm reduction over prevention and enforcement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09687630701538766

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McKeganey, N.
Affiliations
University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
McKeganey, Neil
Venue
Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy
Published
2007-01
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
559-571
ISSN
  • 0968-7637 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3370
OpenAlex
W2014117936
Cited by
7
References
2
Citations by year
2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Drugs Education Prevention and Policy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Keywords
drug policy, harm reduction, Misuse of Drugs Act, drug classification, Royal Society of Arts, substance use prevention, drug enforcement, pharmacotherapy, United Kingdom

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review