The challenge to UK drug policy
Abstract
Drug policy within the UK has been challenged to a greater degree in the last twelve months than at any time over the last ten years. That challenge consists of reports from the Royal Society of Arts and the UK Drug Policy Commission as well as empirical research on the classification of drugs within the Misuse of Drugs Act. These documents identify major weaknesses in the content, direction and delivery of UK drug policy and propose a new direction of policy and new elements of drug policy. In the case of the RSA report and the report from the UK Drug Policy Commission the principal recommendation is for drug policy to shift from its current tri-partite focus on treatment, prevention and education to focus first and foremost on reducing drug-related harm. This paper critically considers the assessment of drug policy set out within these reports and looks at the possible impact of a drug policy that prioritized harm reduction over prevention and enforcement.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Development of a rational scale to assess the harm of drugs of potential misuse
Nutt, D., King, L. A., Saulsbury, W., & Blakemore, C. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60464-4 · Cited by 1,302 · cited 3× · see citing works
“According to Nutt and colleagues the current classification system is fundamentally flawed as a result of the fact that it has ‘evolved in an unsystematic way from somewhat arbitrary foundations with seemingly little scientific basis’ (Nutt et al., 2007).”
BackgroundAmato, L., Davoli, M., A.Perucci, C., Ferri, M., Faggiano, F., & P. Mattick, R. (2005) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2005.02.007 · Cited by 567 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What Can We Learn From The Portuguese Decriminalization of Illicit Drugs?
Hughes, C. E., & Stevens, A. (2010) · British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azq038 · Cited by 440 · see citing works
- Authors
- McKeganey, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- Corresponding author
- McKeganey, Neil
- Venue
- Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 559-571
- ISSN
- 0968-7637 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3370
- OpenAlex
- W2014117936
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Drugs Education Prevention and Policy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
- Keywords
- drug policy, harm reduction, Misuse of Drugs Act, drug classification, Royal Society of Arts, substance use prevention, drug enforcement, pharmacotherapy, United Kingdom
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review