Cited by 105Global trade, sustainability, and social impactGlobalization and political ideologiesWorld Systems and Global Transformations

The political economy of state governance in global production networks: change, crisis and contestation in the South African fruit sector

Open access
Alford, Matthew, Phillips, Nicola·2018·Review of International Political Economy

Abstract

Within the global value chain (GVC) and global production network (GPN) literature, one of the most vibrant areas of debate focuses on dynamics of governance. However, the evolution of these debates has been underpinned by a persistent firm-centrism, with insufficient attention paid to states, public authority and politics. Building on a renewed interest in these themes in recent literature, we contribute to growing demand for a more robust political economy of governance in GVC/GPN debates, wherein the key governance functions of the state can be classified as facilitative, regulatory and distributive in nature. In this context, we explore how the politics of state governance play out in the South African fruit sector, and particularly focus on the labour crisis that occurred in 2012/2013. Our analysis underscores the centrality of the state in governing GVCs/GPNs, and highlights important tensions within and across the three arenas of state governance, and between public and private governance, with significant developmental implications for local actors operating at the base of GVCs/GPNs. Our findings to the importance of a 'relational' understanding of state governance, which reveals how the dynamics of state governance are shaped both by continual political contestation and the competitive commercial context of GVCs/GPNs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09692290.2017.1423367

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 77 · Cited by 105

Authors
Alford, M., & Phillips, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Alford, Matthew
Venue
Review of International Political Economy
Published
2018-01-02
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
98-121
ISSN
  • 0969-2290 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4526
OpenAlex
W2782671714
Cited by
105
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4
FWCI
14.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Review of International Political Economy (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › World Systems and Global Transformations
Keywords
state governance, global value chains, global production networks, political economy of governance, public sector organizations, public-private governance, political contestation, relational governance, agricultural labor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review