The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The rise of financial investment and common ownership in global agrifood firms
Open accessAbstract
Financial investment in the food and agriculture sector has grown in recent decades, including investment in equity-related funds that invest in or track the performance of a range of publicly traded transnational agrifood companies. At their height in recent years, equity-related investment funds accounted for around one third of financial investment in the sector. Despite their significance, investment in the agrifood sector via these types of investment funds has received much less academic and policy attention than other types of financial investment, such as farmland acquisition and commodity speculation. This paper examines the rise of equity-related investment in the agricultural sector and analyzes its implications for the food system. It provides an overview and analysis of the available data on these investment vehicles, including their holdings (i.e. the companies in which they invest) and ownership (i.e. the investors who own shares in those companies). This data shows a rise in common ownership of large agrifood firms by large asset management companies. The paper makes the case that this new pattern of investment in agrifood firms by large asset management firms has the potential to contribute to the already concentrated market power in the agrifood system.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cites
Solutions for a cultivated planet
Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., Mueller, N. D., O’Connell, C., Ray, D. K., West, P. C., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10452 · Cited by 8,476
Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally
Benbrook, C. M. (2016) · Environmental Sciences Europe · doi:10.1186/s12302-016-0070-0 · Cited by 1,890 · cited 2×
“…firms relies on large-scale monoculture farming practices that have been associated with high fossil fuel use, climate change, biodiversity loss, water shortages, and chemical run off from the increased application of fertilizers and pesticides (Benbrook, 2016; Foley et al., 2011; Garnett, 2013).”
BackgroundMaking sense of financialization
van der Zwan, N. (2014) · Socio-Economic Review · doi:10.1093/ser/mwt020 · Cited by 1,434 · cited 1×
“…have paid increasing attention to the process of financialization and its political and economic effects across a range of sectors, including food and agriculture, in recent decades (for a review, see Burch & Lawrence, 2013; Epstein, 2005; Krippner, 2011; Schmidt, 2016; van der Zwan, 2014).”
BackgroundFinancialization of daily life
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-5307 · Cited by 1,208 · cited 1×
“…has also permeated everyday practices to the extent that states have downloaded the responsibility for managing risk onto individuals who in turn are encouraged by financial actors to utilize new financial products as a way to enhance their own security (Aitken, 2007; Isakson, 2015; Martin, 2002).”
BackgroundSutton, M. A., Oenema, O., Erisman, J. W., Leip, A., van Grinsven, H. J. M., & Winiwarter, W. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/472159a · Cited by 1,189
Anticompetitive Effects of Common Ownership
AZAR, J., SCHMALZ, M. C., & TECU, I. (2018) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12698 · Cited by 980 · cited 7×
“Shareholders can make their preferences known to firms’ management via direct engagement, threats to sell stock (in the case of actively managed funds), and voting on the board regarding management decisions, including executive pay incentives (Azar et al., 2018; OECD, 2017).”
InfluentialThe new enclosures: critical perspectives on corporate land deals
White, B., Borras Jr., S. M., Hall, R., Scoones, I., & Wolford, W. (2012) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.691879 · Cited by 913
Agroecology: The Science Of Sustainable Agriculture, Second Edition
Altieri, M. A. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 904
Shareholder value and Financialization: consultancy promises, management moves
Froud, J., Haslam, C., Johal, S., & Williams, K. (2000) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/030851400360578 · Cited by 650
Capitalizing on Crisis: The Political Origins of the Rise of Finance
Chwieroth, J. M. (2017) · The SHAFR Guide Online · doi:10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim280020435 · Cited by 645
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Elhauge E, 2016, Harvard Law Review, 129, 1267
- Food and Agricultural Organization, 2017, Agriculture organization. The future of food and agriculture: Trends and challenges
- Helleiner E, 2018, Governing the World’s Biggest Market: The Politics of Derivatives Regulation After the 2008 Crisis, 199
- HighQuest Partners, US, 2010, Private financial sector investment in farmland and agricultural infrastructure. OECD food, agriculture, and fisheries papers, no. 33
- Khan L., 2017, Harvard Law & Policy Review, 11, 235
- Krouse S., 2016, Wall Street Journal
- Posner E. A., 2017, Antitrust Law Journal, 81, 669
- Wheaton B., 2012, Farmland: An untapped asset class? Quantifying the opportunity to invest in agriculture
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–129 of 129
Neville, K. J. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197535585.003.0002
Neville, K. J. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197535585.003.0006
Neville, K. J. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197535585.003.0001
Variedades de capitalismo nos BRICS
Escher, F. (2021) · Revista Brasileira de Sociologia - RBS · doi:10.20336/rbs.824
Social Finance for Sustainable Food Systems
Stephens, P. (2021) · UWSpace (University of Waterloo) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.17527.55202
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Analysis of legal regulations on agricultural trade in the post-epidemic era
Li, X. (2021) · Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science · doi:10.1080/09064710.2021.2008480
“high, and it is difficult to compete with the agricultural products exported by the resource-rich countries, so it needs to strengthen protection (Clapp 2019).”
BackgroundRetractedSetiawan, L., Muntasir, N. F., Fahreza, S., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1109/icaibda53487.2021.9689702
(2021) · Le Cavalier Bleu eBooks · doi:10.3917/lcb.delaf.2021.01.0176
Fontanétti, A., Sais, A. C., Montebello, A. E. S., Rossi, F., Marjotta-Maistro, M. C., & Forti, V. A. (2022) · Editora Científica Digital eBooks · doi:10.37885/978-65-5360-144-4
Jeziorny, D. L., Rech, L. T., Kühn, D. D., et al. (2024) · Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais · doi:10.22296//2317-1529.rbeur.202412en
Neville, K. J. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197535585.002.0007
Neville, K. J. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197535585.002.0008
Neville, K. J. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197535585.002.0003
Neville, K. J. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197535585.002.0004
Stock Markets and Industrial Development of Europe: Lessons for Nigeria
Ogbulu, O. M., & Ejem, C. A. (2024) · Research Journal of Finance and Accounting · doi:10.7176/rjfa/15-5-03
Cultured meat and other alternatives and substitutes to animal products
Niazifar, M., Taghizadeh, A., Palangı, V., Bayraktar, Ö. H., & Lackner, M. K. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-15976-3.00141-0
Common ownership and environmental corporate social responsibility in a vertically related marketPreprint
Zhang, C., & Lee, S. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5722731
Wood, B., Williams, O. D., Baker, P., Nagarajan, V., & Sacks, G. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14379398
Wood, B., Williams, O. D., Baker, P., Nagarajan, V., & Sacks, G. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14379395
Wood, B., Robinson, E., Baker, P., Paraje, G. R., Mialon, M., van Tulleken, C., & Sacks, G. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26639419
Gaucher-Holm, A., Wood, B., Sacks, G., & Vanderlee, L. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26574640
Wood, B., Robinson, E., Baker, P., Paraje, G. R., Mialon, M., van Tulleken, C., & Sacks, G. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26639422
Wood, B., Baker, P., Scrinis, G., McCoy, D., Williams, O. D., & Sacks, G. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.17120222
Wood, B., Williams, O. D., Baker, P., Nagarajan, V., & Sacks, G. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14379401
Wood, B., Robinson, E., Baker, P., Paraje, G. R., Mialon, M., van Tulleken, C., & Sacks, G. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26639416
The moral economy of global priorities: fusing profit and public duty in malnutrition governance
Uribe, J. (2026) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290.2026.2615410
“As Clapp (2019) argued, the financial crisis further re-entrenched financial power at the very heart of global food governance and led to an increased presence of market actors who profited from the crisis.”
Hennessey, M., Tak, M., Karamchedu, A., & Syndicus, I. (2026) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-026-10891-9
“J. Clapp (2019) and Howard et al. ( 2021) raise concerns over the influence of large agri-business firms on government decisions and policy development which impacts the food system.”
Mutale, B., & Mayanja, E. K. (2026) · Cogent Food & Agriculture · doi:10.1080/23311932.2026.2687211 · Cited by 2
Who pays for food? Rethinking agri-food system externalities and power after EAT-Lancet 2.0
Sievert, K., Clapp, J., Howard, P. H., et al. (2026) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2026.101803
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Clapp, J.
- Affiliations
- School of Environment, Resources and Sustainability, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
- Venue
- Review of International Political Economy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-06-26
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 604-629
- ISSN
- 0969-2290 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4526
- OpenAlex
- W2954054067
- Semantic Scholar
- 3371300c67e4b6e657190af8f0a5e4b1bacb1b64
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 12
- FWCI
- 32.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Review of International Political Economy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Development › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
- Keywords
- collective ownership, investment companies, equity funds, market concentration, food systems, agricultural land acquisition, commodity speculation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
