Cited by 184Student Assessment and FeedbackEvaluation of Teaching PracticesCommunication in Education and Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Student perceptions of classroom feedback

Gamlem, Siv M., Smith, Kari·2013·Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice

Abstract

Feedback to students has been identified as a key strategy in learning and teaching, but we know less about how feedback is understood by students. The purpose of this study is to gain more insight into lower secondary students’ perceptions of when and how they find classroom feedback useful. This article draws on data generated through individual interviews with 11 students representing four lower secondary schools (grades 8–10, aged 13–15) in Norway. Feedback types are identified from students’ perceptions, coded and indexed. A feedback typology is designed to provide a framework which can be used to reflect on useful classroom feedback based on lower secondary school students’ perceptions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0969594x.2012.749212

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Aase , T.H. and Fossåskaret , E. 2007 . Skapte virkeligheter. Om produksjon og tolking av kvalitative data [Created realities. About the production and interpretation of qualitative data] , Oslo : Universitetsforlaget .
  2. Frijda , N.H. 1986 . The emotions , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
  3. Furre , H. , Danielsen , I.-J. , Stigbert-Jamt , R. and Skaalvik , E.M. 2006 . Analyse av den nasjonale undersøkelsen ‘Elevundersøkelsen’ 2006 [Analysis of the national survey ‘Student survey’ 2006] , Kristiansand : Oxford Research AS .
  4. Kvale , S. 2001 . Det kvalitative forskingsintervju [The qualitative research interview] , Oslo : Gyldendal Akademisk .
  5. Lindgren , A.-L. and Sparrman , A. 2003 . Om at bli dokumenterad. Etiska aspekter på førskolans arbete med dokumentation [About being documented. Ethical aspects of preschool work with documentation] . Pedagogisk Forskning i Sverige , 8 ( 1–2 ) : 58 – 69 .
  6. Skaalvik , E. , Garmannslund , P.E. and Viblemo , T.E. 2009 . Analyse av Elevundersøkelsen 2009 [Analysis of student survey 2009] , Kristiansand : Oxford Research & NTNU . 1–124
  7. Thagaard , T. 2002 . Systematikk og innlevelse. En innføring i kvalitativ metode [Systematic approach and empathy. An introduction to qualitative methods] , Bergen : Fagbokforlaget Vigmostad & Bjørke AS .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–182 of 182

Metadata

Authors
Gamlem, S. M., & Smith, K.
Affiliations
  • Volda University College (NO)
  • University of Bergen (NO)
Corresponding author
Gamlem, Siv M.
Venue
Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice
Published
2013-01-22
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
150-169
ISSN
  • 0969-594X (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-329X
OpenAlex
W2100654949
Cited by
184
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 1
FWCI
41.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
Keywords
classroom feedback, student perceptions, junior high school students, feedback types, learning and teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review