The DOI matches its Crossref record.
English language assessment in China: policies, practices and impacts
Abstract
This Special Issue has been guest edited by Guoxing Yu (University of Bristol) and Yan Jin (Shanghai Jiaotong University). English language assessment is a global phenomenon, for the reasons articu...
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, recent studies (Chen, May, Klenowski, & Kettle, 2014;Gu, 2014;Yu & Jin, 2014;Yin & Buck, 2015) have started to explore formative assessment in secondary schools.”
From ‘Complex teaching realities’ and ‘deep rooted cultural traditions’: Barriers to the implementation and internalisation of formative assessment in China (2016) · cites this paper as Yu & Jin, 2014
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- 10.1080/0969594x.2010.527701 · DOI
- 10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.576.b · DOI
- 10.1177/0265532207083743 · DOI
- 10.1080/03098770701625761 · DOI
- 10.1080/10670569508724213 · DOI
- Fu K., 1986, 中国外语教育史 [A history of foreign language education in China]
- 10.1080/09695940120033216 · DOI
- 10.1080/03054985.2011.559387 · DOI
- 10.2307/25109555 · DOI
- Messick S., 1989, Educational measurement, 13
- 10.1080/10670560124330 · DOI
- 10.1080/0969594960030105 · DOI
- 10.1080/17516230801900444 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Poole, A. (2016) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2016.1156242 · Cited by 46
“Zhang et al. (2005) also note that this is a serious barrier to implementing formative assessment in the Chinese context.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, G., & Jin, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-07-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 245-250
- ISSN
- 0969-594X (ISSN-L)
- 1465-329X
- OpenAlex
- W2093206504
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 11.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice (publishedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Keywords
- English language assessment, language testing policy, English language teaching, language proficiency assessment, China, language education policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
