Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 5Posthumanist Ethics and ActivismGeographies of human-animal interactionsPhilosophical and Theoretical Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

AFFECTIVE ETHOLOGIES: monk parakeets and non-human inflections in affect theory

Smailbegović, Ada·2015·Angelaki

Abstract

:Recent attempts to engage and develop modes of ethological practice that avoid deterministic and mechanistic accounts of animal action have often relied on affect as a way of articulating how animal bodies affect and are in turn affected by the animate and inanimate bodies around them. In this context affect has often functioned as an instigating site of change that opens up the experience of a particular animal to new possibilities for action and relation. This paper seeks to bring the significant role that affect has played in opening up new directions in ethological theory and practice in contact with a discussion of two currents in affect theory – one shaped by the genealogy of philosophical thought that stretches from Spinoza, through Gilles Deleuze, to contemporary thinkers such as Brian Massumi, and the other emerging from the reception of the American psychologist and cybernetics thinker Silvan Tomkins, in the context of queer theory, through the work of Eve Sedgwick and Adam Frank. The locus of intersection for these different modes of theoretical practice is the site-specific case study of monk parakeets (Myopsitta mona-chus) who have drawn on and incorporated the ornamental elaborations of human architecture into their own complex architectural nest constructions at Brooklyn's Green-Wood Cemetery.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0969725x.2015.1065118

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Avery M.L., 2002, USDA National Wildlife Research Center – Staff Publications
  2. Bhatia N., 2012, Bracket: Architecture, Environment, Digital Culture, 2, 8
  3. 10.1650/0010-5422(2007)109[389:GVICCO]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  4. Chaudhuri U., Zoöpolis
  5. Crist E., 1999, Images of Animals
  6. Darwin C., 1860, Journal of Researches into the Natural History and Geology of the Countries Visited During the Voyage of H.M.S. “Beagle” Round the World
  7. Deleuze G., 1988, Spinoza: Practical Philosophy
  8. Deleuze G., 1987, A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia
  9. Descartes R., 2006, A Discourse on the Method of Correctly Conducting One's Reason and Seeking Truth in the Sciences
  10. 10.1177/1357034X04042938 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Despret V., 2005, Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, 360
  12. Eberhard J.R., 1998, Wilson Bulletin, 110, 463
  13. 10.1215/9780822392811 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04919.x · DOI
  15. Gregg M., 2010, The Affect Theory Reader, 10.1215/9780822393047 · DOI
  16. Grosz E., 2008, Chaos, Territory, Art: Deleuze and the Framing of the Earth
  17. 10.1215/9780822386551 · DOI
  18. 10.1093/isle/isp025 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.10.010 · DOI
  20. Holmberg T., 2015, Urban Animals: Crowding in Zoocities, 10.4324/9781315735726 · DOI
  21. 10.4324/9780203466025 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Ingraham C., 2006, Architecture, Animal, Human: The Asymmetrical Condition, 10.4324/9780203799604 · DOI
  23. Malabou C., 2008, What Should We Do with Our Brain? Trans
  24. Manaugh G., 2012, Bracket: Architecture, Environment, Digital Culture, 2, 10
  25. Navarro J.L., 1992, Wilson Bulletin, 104, 413
  26. Oyama S., 1985, The Ontogeny of Information
  27. Pepperberg I.M., 1999, The Alex Studies: Cognitive and Communicative Abilities of Grey Parrots
  28. Philo C., 1998, Animal Geographies: Place, Politics, and Identity in the Nature–Culture Borderlands, 51
  29. Pitts-Taylor V., 2010, Health, 14, 635, 10.1177/1363459309360796 · DOI
  30. Robertson L., 2003, Occasional Work and Seven Walks from the Office for Soft Architecture
  31. Roof J., 2003, Zoontologies: The Question of the Animal, 101
  32. 10.1017/S1745855209990330 · DOI
  33. 10.1186/1471-2148-8-217 · DOI
  34. 10.1086/448761 · DOI
  35. Seigworth G.J., 2010, The Affect Theory Reader, 1
  36. 10.7208/chicago/9780226750750.001.0001 · DOI
  37. 10.2307/1370222 · DOI
  38. Sparks J., 1990, Parrots: A Natural History
  39. Spinoza, 2006, The Essential Spinoza: Ethics and Related Writings
  40. Stein, G. “Portraits and Repetition.”Look at Me Now and Here I Am: Writings and Lectures 1909–45. New York: Penguin, 1971. 99–124. Print.
  41. Tomkins S., 2008, Affect Imagery Consciousness: The Complete Edition
  42. Tomkins S., 1995, Shame and its Sisters: A Silvan Tomkins Reader
  43. Van Dooren T., 2012, Humanimalia: A Journal of Human/Animal Interface Studies, 3, 1, 10.52537/humanimalia.10046 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Von Frisch K., 1974, Animal Architecture
  45. Von Uexküll J., 2010, A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans
  46. 10.1080/10455759609358677 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Smailbegović, A.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Smailbegović, Ada
Venue
Angelaki
Published
2015-07-03
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
21-42
ISSN
  • 0969-725X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2899
OpenAlex
W2560702233
Cited by
5
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Angelaki (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geographies of human-animal interactions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis
Keywords
affect, ethology, affect theory, Spinoza, Gilles Deleuze, Brian Massumi, Silvan Tomkins, queer theory, Eve Sedgwick, monk parakeet, nest building, animal architecture, animal agency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.