CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 14Sports Performance and TrainingPhysical Education and Training StudiesCardiovascular and exercise physiology

The effects of Power, Speed, Skill and Anaerobic Capacity of different training models in young male basketball players

Yilmaz, Gürkan·2014·The Anthropologist
DOI 10.1080/09720073.2014.11891619
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to examine the power, speed, skill and anaerobic capacity on men’s basketball for 16 weeks endurance training along with the general basketball training. The study involved 36 male basketball players such as, Control Group (CG), Endurance Group (PE) and the General Endurance Group (GE). The shot test, 20 m running test, squat jump, countermovement jump, running-based anaerobic sprint tests were applied to the groups during the Pre-Exercise and Post-Exercise. Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine the differences between evaluations of the groups. While considering the Running Based Anaerobic Speed Test of the Difference among groups in the evaluation of 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th in run evaluation Pre-Exercise was between CG and PE and between CG and GG, Post-Exercise was in favor between CG and PE in all running values. When considering the Power Index Between Difference Groups, In evaluation of The Pre-Exercise, values were 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th runs, and there was significant difference between the groups CG and GD and CG and PE. As a result, it is considered to be appropriate for practicing the method in the development of young basketball players of the cardiovascular and metabolic stability in addition to specific agent’s interval training.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09720073.2014.11891619

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The present study extends literature that ties agility and reaction time to perceptual-cognitive factors and sport-specific stimuli by showing that a brief, structured psychological intervention can enhance these motor outcomes alongside mental-health indicators.

    “The present study extends literature that ties agility and reaction time to perceptual–cognitive factors and sport-specific stimuli [3,4,5,6,7,9,10,11,12,13,15,68] by showing that a brief, structured psychological intervention can enhance these motor outcomes alongside mental-health indicators.”

    From Effects of the SmartACT Intervention on Motor and Psychological Variables in Adolescent Athletes: A Controlled Trial Using BlazePod and Microgate. (2025) · cites this paper as [13]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Yilmaz, G.
Affiliations
Nigde University, School of Physical Education and Sport , Nigde, Turkey
Venue
The Anthropologist
Publisher
Kamla Raj Enterprises
Published
2014-11
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
877-883
ISSN
0972-0073 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1080/09720073.2014.11891619
OpenAlex
W2770281117
Cited by
14
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Anthropologist (publishedVersion)
  • Niğde Üniversitesi Açık Erişim Sistemi (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
basketball training, endurance training, anaerobic capacity, sprint speed, muscle power, young male athletes, interval training, cardiorespiratory fitness, countermovement jump, squat jump

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review