The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Power study of anova versus Kruskal-Wallis test
Abstract
This paper describes the comparison of the anova and the Kruskal-Wallis test by means of the power when violating the assumption about normally distributed populations. The permutation method is used as a simulation method to determine the power of the test. It appears that in the case of asymmetric populations the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test performs better than the parametric equivalent anova method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9 · Cited by 21,230
Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis
Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441 · Cited by 13,912
Glass, G. V., Peckham, P. D., & Sanders, J. R. (1972) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543042003237 · Cited by 1,826 · cited 1×
“, [5] have done research into the effect of the violation of the normality assumption in the case of anova (Analysis of Variance).”
Permutation Tests: A Practical Guide to Resampling Methods for Testing Hypotheses
Niknian, M. (1995) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1995.10484341 · Cited by 1,462
Good, P. (1994) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2346-5 · Cited by 387
The Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test under scrutiny
Fagerland, M. W., & Sandvik, L. (2009) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.3561 · Cited by 247
Blair, R. C., & Higgins, J. J. (1980) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164905 · Cited by 121
Analysis of Likert scale data in disability and medical rehabilitation research.
Nanna, M. J., & Sawilowsky, S. S. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.1.55 · Cited by 117
Blair, R. C., & Higgins, J. J. (1980) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986005004309 · Cited by 113
ANOVA: A Paradigm for Low Power and Misleading Measures of Effect Size?
Wilcox, R. R. (1995) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543065001051 · Cited by 108
Cited by
The determinants of business contribution to the 2030 Agenda: Introducing the SDG Reporting Score
Pizzi, S., Rosati, F., & Venturelli, A. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2628 · Cited by 426
Stakeholders prioritization of climate-smart agriculture interventions: Evaluation of a framework
Khatri-Chhetri, A., Pant, A., Aggarwal, P. K., Vasireddy, V. V., & Yadav, A. (2019) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2019.03.002 · Cited by 146
Kazemi, N., Badri, S. A., Adinehvand, E., & Rostami, K. (2022) · SN Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43545-022-00567-6 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Hecke, T. V.
- Venue
- Journal of Statistics and Management Systems
- Publisher
- Taru Publications
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 241-247
- ISSN
- 0972-0510 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-0014
- OpenAlex
- W1973030886
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Power study of anova versus Kruskal-Wallis test. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09720510.2012.10701623
- The paper
- Hecke, T. V. (2012). Power study of anova versus Kruskal-Wallis test. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720510.2012.10701623
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
