Cited by 11Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsGait Recognition and AnalysisPhysical Activity and Health

HARGRURNN: Human activity recognition using inertial body sensor gated recurrent units recurrent neural network

Jangir, Mahendra Kumar, Singh, Karan·2019·Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography

Abstract

Internet of Things (IoT), wearable devices, and smartphones are more ubiquitous and available at a reasonable cost. Fitbit, Microsoft Band, Apple Watch, MI band, and Smartphone apps namely Strava and Runkeeper are some of the commercial products which are already available in the market. These products are embedded with the sensors that facilitate them to regularly sense and capture the environmental, physiological, functional data for applications in healthcare, wellbeing, and sports. These sensing devices have mediocre computing capabilities for data processing and transfer. The size of devices is so compact that can be worn on the body put in the pocket or locate in the house. This large scale recorded a wealth of physiological data require an efficient and meaningful interpretation as well as the proper and proficient method of analysis and the classification of data.Human Activity Recognition is classified into two features say Shallow and Deep features. Shallow features are extracted conventionally with the help of a simple machine learning approach. The large-scale time series situ data which require high computation power, processing capabilities, activities, and real-time classification, Deep Learning (DL) is the promising technique to deal with these activities.Weexercise the triaxial Accelerometers and triaxial Gyroscope to capture the data for HAR. The data set measured by the inertial sensor is then divided into the segments of 4 to 10s. The performance will be shown on the parameters of precision (%), Recall (%) and Accuracy (%).Parameter optimization and extraction of the segments are the two areas where we can carry forward our research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09720529.2019.1696552

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • [201] utilizes attention with a 1D CNN GRU, achieving HAR performances of 96.5% ± 1.0%, 93.1% ± 2.2%, and 89.3% ± 1.3% on Heterogeneous, Skoda, and PAMAP2 datasets, respectively.

    “[201] utilizes attention in combination with a 1D CNN Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs), achieving HAR performances of 96.5% ± 1.0%, 93.1% ± 2.2%, and 89.3% ± 1.3% on Heterogeneous [86], Skoda [103], and PAMAP2 [91] datasets, respectively.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jangir, M. K., & Singh, K.
Affiliations
Jawaharlal Nehru University (IN)
Corresponding author
Jangir, Mahendra Kumar
Venue
Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography
Published
2019-11-17
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
1577-1587
ISSN
  • 0972-0529 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-0065
OpenAlex
W2998763852
Cited by
11
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
human activity recognition, inertial sensors, wearable devices, gated recurrent unit, recurrent neural networks, triaxial accelerometer, triaxial gyroscope, time series classification, Internet of Things

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review