Cited by 9Essential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityGenetics and Plant BreedingPhytochemicals and Medicinal Plants

Morphological Variability and Essential Oil Composition of four Ocimum basilicum L. cultivars

Nurzyñska-Wierdak, Renata·2014·Journal of Essential Oil Bearing Plants

Abstract

This study characterized the morphological variability as well as essential oil composition of four sweet basil cultivars growing in south-eastern Poland. The cultivars displayed a wide diversity of morphological and chemical characteristics. Oil content of the tested plants varied from 0.91 % to 1.75 % in air-dry herbage. The essential oil composition was analyzed by means of GC-MS and GC-FID techniques. Sixty six components were found, representing 100 % of the essential oil. Linalool was the most abundant component (29.6 %-77.5 %), followed by methyl chavicol (0.3 %-32.5 %), eugenol (null to 27.6 %), (E)- methyl cinnamate (null to 11.2 %), 1,8-cineole (1.0 %-9.4 %), α-cadinol (2.8 %-6.5 %) and germacrene D (2.1 %-4.1 %).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0972060x.2013.855362

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Thai basils of different genotypes can be well differentiated on the basis of both essential oil compositions and sensory properties.

    “Thai basils of different genotypes could be well differentiated on the basis of both essential oil compositions and sensory properties [11,12,13].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Nurzyñska-Wierdak R., 2007, Herba Pol, 53, 255
  2. Taie H.A.A., 2010, Not. Bot. Hort. Agrobot. Cluj, 38, 119
  3. Paduraru I., 2008, Farmacia, 4, 402
  4. Sekar K., 2009, J. Phytol, 1, 408
  5. Nurzyñska-Wierdak R., 2011, Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus, 10, 207
  6. Chang X., 2009, J. Hortic. For, 1, 27
  7. Dzida K., 2010, Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus, 9, 153
  8. Özek T., 2010, Rec. Nat. Prod, 4, 180
  9. Stajkovic O., 2007, Food Technol. Biotechnol, 45, 213
  10. Vidhya N., 2011, Indian J. Exp. Biol, 49, 871
  11. Koba K., 2009, Bangladesh J. Pharmacol, 4, 1
  12. Sajjadi S.S., 2006, DARU, 14, 128

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nurzyñska-Wierdak, R.
Venue
Journal of Essential Oil Bearing Plants
Published
2014-01-02
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
112-119
ISSN
  • 0972-060X (ISSN-L)
  • 0976-5026
OpenAlex
W2026957924
Cited by
9
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Essential Oil Bearing Plants (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants
Keywords
Ocimum basilicum, cultivar differences, morphological variation, essential oil composition, linalool, estragole, eugenol, 1,8-cineole, α-cadinol, germacrene D, essential oil content

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review