The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improved calibration of Landsat-5 TM applicable for high-latitude and dark areas
Abstract
The Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper (TM) has provided data for more than 17 years, making it one of the most successful missions so far. TM sensor degradation is well documented and although efforts are made to account for this degradation when calibrating the sensor, such calibrations are often done over high reflective and bright surfaces in combination with a high solar irradiance. These conditions are not found in high-latitude and dark areas, making the calibration coefficients inappropriate to use. In this study reflectances obtained from TM bands 1–4 over a high-arctic area from 1987–1998 are compared to reflectances obtained from the Landsat-7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM + ) over the same area in 1999–2000. From the reflectance comparison it was found that a correction of the calibration gain could be described by a power function using days since launch as the controlling variable. From the power function, updated and lifetime calibration coefficients for TM bands 1–4 applicable for high-latitude and dark areas were determined. Furthermore, the study showed a continuous decrease of the TM sensor response with band 1 being the most affected and band 4 the most stable. The study also showed the possibility of using ETM+ to determine updated calibration coefficients for TM by a cross-calibration even though the ETM+ and TM scenes are not coincident.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Thematic mapper sensors show decreasing response times over periods of use (Kamstrup & Hansen, 2003).”
From Impact of Sensor Degradation on Measurement Uncertainty in Prognostics and Maintenance Decision-Making: State of the art and challenges (2025) · cites this paper as Kamstrup & Hansen, 2003
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Arino O., 1995, ESA products and processing algorithms jor Landsat
- 10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00111-4 · DOI
- 10.1080/01431160110113935 · DOI
- 10.1080/01431160110113881 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-373750-2.50009-4 · DOI
- 10.1080/014311699213532 · DOI
- Meltofte H, 1997, ZERO. Zackenberg ecological research operations, 2nd annual report 1996
- Modtran, 1997, PcModWin Manual
- 10.1016/0034-4257(95)00035-Y · DOI
- Olsson H., 1995, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 16, 81, 10.1080/01431169508954373 · DOI
- Søgaard H., 2000, Global Biochemical Cycles, 14, 725, 10.1029/1999GB001137 · DOI
- Tamstorm F. P, 2000, Hyperspectral campaign at Zackenberg, ZERO 6th Annual Report
- Teillet P. M, 2000, Proceedings of SPIE conference 4049
- 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00248-6 · DOI
- Thome K., 1997, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 63, 853
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thai, T.-T. N., Do, P., Iung, B., & Gardoni, P. (2025) · International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management · doi:10.36001/ijphm.2025.v16i4.4306 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Kamstrup, N., & Hansen, L. B.
- Affiliations
- a Institute of Geography , University of Copenhagen , Denmark
- b Institute of Geography , University of Copenhagen , Oester Voldgade 10, 1350, Denmark
- Venue
- International Journal of Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 5345-5365
- ISSN
- 0143-1161
- 1366-5901
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review