Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Improved calibration of Landsat-5 TM applicable for high-latitude and dark areas

Kamstrup, N., Hansen, L. B.·2003·International Journal of Remote Sensing

Abstract

The Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper (TM) has provided data for more than 17 years, making it one of the most successful missions so far. TM sensor degradation is well documented and although efforts are made to account for this degradation when calibrating the sensor, such calibrations are often done over high reflective and bright surfaces in combination with a high solar irradiance. These conditions are not found in high-latitude and dark areas, making the calibration coefficients inappropriate to use. In this study reflectances obtained from TM bands 1–4 over a high-arctic area from 1987–1998 are compared to reflectances obtained from the Landsat-7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM + ) over the same area in 1999–2000. From the reflectance comparison it was found that a correction of the calibration gain could be described by a power function using days since launch as the controlling variable. From the power function, updated and lifetime calibration coefficients for TM bands 1–4 applicable for high-latitude and dark areas were determined. Furthermore, the study showed a continuous decrease of the TM sensor response with band 1 being the most affected and band 4 the most stable. The study also showed the possibility of using ETM+ to determine updated calibration coefficients for TM by a cross-calibration even though the ETM+ and TM scenes are not coincident.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10143116031000156846

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Arino O., 1995, ESA products and processing algorithms jor Landsat
  2. 10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00111-4 · DOI
  3. 10.1080/01431160110113935 · DOI
  4. 10.1080/01431160110113881 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/B978-0-12-373750-2.50009-4 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/014311699213532 · DOI
  7. Meltofte H, 1997, ZERO. Zackenberg ecological research operations, 2nd annual report 1996
  8. Modtran, 1997, PcModWin Manual
  9. 10.1016/0034-4257(95)00035-Y · DOI
  10. Olsson H., 1995, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 16, 81, 10.1080/01431169508954373 · DOI
  11. Søgaard H., 2000, Global Biochemical Cycles, 14, 725, 10.1029/1999GB001137 · DOI
  12. Tamstorm F. P, 2000, Hyperspectral campaign at Zackenberg, ZERO 6th Annual Report
  13. Teillet P. M, 2000, Proceedings of SPIE conference 4049
  14. 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00248-6 · DOI
  15. Thome K., 1997, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 63, 853

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
Kamstrup, N., & Hansen, L. B.
Affiliations
  • a Institute of Geography , University of Copenhagen , Denmark
  • b Institute of Geography , University of Copenhagen , Oester Voldgade 10, 1350, Denmark
Venue
International Journal of Remote Sensing
Published
2003-01
Volume
24
Issue
24
Pages
5345-5365
ISSN
  • 0143-1161
  • 1366-5901
Cited by
4
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review