Cited by 68Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political ViolenceDefense, Military, and Policy StudiesPolitics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East

Terrorism and the macroeconomy: Evidence from Pakistan

Open access
Mehmood, Sultan·2014·Defence and Peace Economics

Abstract

Pakistan with highest number of terrorism related deaths of any country over the past decade, the number exceeding the total terrorism related deaths for both the European and North American continents, provides an ideal laboratory to study impact of terrorism on the macroeconomy. Quasi-Structural VAR, Vector Error Correction Model, Impulse Response Functions and Granger-Causality tests on a sample that covers over 4500 terrorist incidents and consequent 10, 200 deaths [from 1973 to 2010] are employed to study the relationship between terrorism and the macroeconomy. One of the major advantages of the current methodology is that it not only enables one to circumvent the heterogeneity biases inherent in cross-country studies but it also allows distinguishing between short and long-run effects. It is documented that cumulatively terrorism has cost Pakistan around 33.02% of its real national income i.e. terrorism costs Pakistan around 1% of real GDP per capita growth every year.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10242694.2013.793529

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mehmood, S.
Affiliations
CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (NL)
Corresponding author
Mehmood, Sultan
Venue
Defence and Peace Economics
Published
2013-05-10
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
509-534
ISSN
  • 1024-2694 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8267
OpenAlex
W2072930760
Cited by
68
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
14.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Defence and Peace Economics (publishedVersion)
  • Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Universiteit Utrecht
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Keywords
terrorism, GDP growth, Pakistan, short-run and long-run effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review