CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Changes in the optimal speed of walking with the level of lower limb amputation

Genin, J. J., Bastien, G. J., Detrembleur, C., Willems, P. A.·2005·Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
DOI 10.1080/10255840512331388524
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In normal walking, the relation between gross massspecific energy consumption rate (P in W kg− 1) and speed (V in m s− 1) can best be described by a quadratic function (Zarrugh et al. 1974). The gr...

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10255840512331388524

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The phenomenon that preferred walking speed is close to the COT minimum has been observed in a variety of population groups and other species.

    “This has been found in a variety of population groups and other species.”

    From Preferred walking speed on rough terrain: is it all about energetics? (2019) · cites this paper as Genin et al., 2005

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 10.1007/s00421-004-1286-z · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00008-5 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/BF00430237 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Genin, J. J., Bastien, G. J., Detrembleur, C., & Willems, P. A.
Venue
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2005-09
Volume
8
Issue
sup1
Pages
115-116
ISSN
  • 1025-5842
  • 1476-8259
DOI
10.1080/10255840512331388524
Cited by
3
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review