Cited by 58Criminal Justice and PenologyCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Law and Policy

The moving targets of penal abolitionism: ICOPA, past, present and future

Piché, Justin, Larsen, Mike·2010·Contemporary Justice Review

Abstract

The history of the International Conference on Penal Abolition (ICOPA) is explored, assessing major trends shaping the current growth of carceral practices and offering suggestions for the future of the conference movement. The goal here is to facilitate the expansion of abolitionism by describing the changing nature of what is to be abolished. A discussion of the emergence of prison abolitionism and of the ICOPA is presented, describing the shift in focus from prison to penal abolition. Taking these developments and character into account, an abolitionist gaze must be expanded to reflect a carceral abolition project, encompassing contemporary penal abolitionism while acknowledging the proliferation of carceral practices and spaces outside the traditional penal system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10282580.2010.517964

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When governments unravel the welfare state, institutions of confinement expand.

    “But there is also a push-and-pull dynamic at play here: when governments tug at and wholly unravel the threads of the welfare state, institutions of confinement expand ever outward (O'Malley, 2014; Piché & Larsen, 2010).”

    From Huronia’s lessons: how ableist violence determines health (2025) · cites this paper as Piché & Larsen, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Piché, J., & Larsen, M.
Affiliations
  • Carleton University (CA)
  • York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Piché, Justin
Venue
Contemporary Justice Review
Published
2010-12
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
391-410
ISSN
  • 1028-2580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-2248
OpenAlex
W2003988528
Cited by
58
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
13.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Contemporary Justice Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
Keywords
prison abolitionism, penal abolitionism, penal system

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review