The moving targets of penal abolitionism: ICOPA, past, present and future
Abstract
The history of the International Conference on Penal Abolition (ICOPA) is explored, assessing major trends shaping the current growth of carceral practices and offering suggestions for the future of the conference movement. The goal here is to facilitate the expansion of abolitionism by describing the changing nature of what is to be abolished. A discussion of the emergence of prison abolitionism and of the ICOPA is presented, describing the shift in focus from prison to penal abolition. Taking these developments and character into account, an abolitionist gaze must be expanded to reflect a carceral abolition project, encompassing contemporary penal abolitionism while acknowledging the proliferation of carceral practices and spaces outside the traditional penal system.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When governments unravel the welfare state, institutions of confinement expand.
“But there is also a push-and-pull dynamic at play here: when governments tug at and wholly unravel the threads of the welfare state, institutions of confinement expand ever outward (O'Malley, 2014; Piché & Larsen, 2010).”
From Huronia’s lessons: how ableist violence determines health (2025) · cites this paper as Piché & Larsen, 2010
Cites
The Curious Eclipse of Prison Ethnography in the Age of Mass Incarceration
Wacquant, L. (2002) · Ethnography · doi:10.1177/1466138102003004012 · Cited by 474 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…along with other observers, “failed to realize that, far from being fated to recede into the societal background to make room for dispersed disciplines, the prison was here to stay right alongside them – indeed, it was about to grow to proportions never before envisioned” (Wacquant, 2002, p. 384).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
New abolition, criminology and a critical carceral studies
Brown, M., & Schept, J. (2017) · Punishment & Society · doi:10.1177/1462474516666281 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Huronia’s lessons: how ableist violence determines health
Rinaldi, J. (2025) · Handbook on the Social Determinants of Health · doi:10.4337/9781035302093.00020
- Authors
- Piché, J., & Larsen, M.
- Affiliations
- Carleton University (CA)
- York University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Piché, Justin
- ORCID
- Piché, Justin
- Venue
- Contemporary Justice Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 391-410
- ISSN
- 1028-2580 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-2248
- OpenAlex
- W2003988528
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 13.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Contemporary Justice Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
- Keywords
- prison abolitionism, penal abolitionism, penal system
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review