COMMODIFICATION AND INSTRUMENTALITY IN CULTURAL POLICY
Abstract
Cultural policy has been changing in similar ways across many countries in recent years, with these changes placing an increasing emphasis upon the use of “culture”, and particularly the “arts”, as instrumental tools for the attainment of non‐cultural, non‐arts, goals and objectives. It is argued that this process is closely related to a broader set of societal changes – specifically the establishment and acceptance of a commodified conception of public policy – and that the future shape of cultural policy cannot be fully understood without reference to these changes. The fact that the precise nature of both the cultural policy and societal changes that are taking place differ considerably between nation‐states implies that arguments concerning the “globalisation” of culture and cultural policy require reformulation to take into account the specific variations that are generated by governmental choices.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The policy strategies for Scotland, England and Wales are instrumental in that they aim to fulfil wider outcomes - social, economic and political - than those that are more traditionally cultural in nature.
“The policy strategies for Scotland, England and Wales are therefore instrumental in that they aim to fulfil wider outcomes -social, economic and political -than those that are more traditionally cultural in nature (Gray 2007).”
From Museums and the ‘new museology’: theory, practice and organisational change (2014) · cites this paper as Gray 2007
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Museums and the ‘new museology’: theory, practice and organisational change
McCall, V., & Gray, C. (2014) · Museum Management and Curatorship · doi:10.1080/09647775.2013.869852 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
“The policy strategies for Scotland, England and Wales are therefore instrumental in that they aim to fulfil wider outcomes – social, economic and political – than those that are more traditionally cultural in nature (Gray 2007, 2008).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
- Authors
- Gray, C.
- Affiliations
- De Montfort University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Gray, Clive
- Venue
- International Journal of Cultural Policy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-215
- ISSN
- 1028-6632 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-2833
- OpenAlex
- W2122739605
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 44.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Cultural Policy (publishedVersion)
- DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Cultural Industries and Urban Development
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Arts, Culture, and Music Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
- Keywords
- cultural policy, commodification, instrumentalism, arts policy, public policy, cultural policy reform, social change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review