Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 10

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Going spare? Concert tickets, touting and cultural value

Behr, Adam, Cloonan, Martin·2020·International Journal of Cultural Policy

Abstract

This article explores recent events around the secondary market for concert tickets in the UK. It first outlines the nature of the primary and secondary markets for concert tickets and then the story of attempts in the UK to regulate them over a twenty-year period, providing the political and industrial context. It moves on to examine key aspects of the political debates around tickets and the findings of enquiries into the subject – including the rhetoric around ‘real fans’ – and discusses the gradual dilution of legislative proposals (from an outright ban, to a cap, to mandating transparency) and legitimation of the secondary market. We then discuss the broader ramifications of the secondary ticket market for access to cultural events and suggest that those who wish to mobilise against the secondary market could gain much by looking beyond the market value of tickets towards ideas of cultural value which have hitherto played little part in the debate.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10286632.2018.1431224

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Budnick D., 2011, Ticketmasters: The Rise of the Concert Industry and How the Public Got Scalped
  2. Campbell Keegan Ltd, 2007, The Secondary Market for Tickets (Music and Sport) Qualitative Research Report
  3. Channel 4. 2012. “The Great Ticket Scandal – Channel 4 Statement.” February 22. Accessed January 23, 2018. http://www.channel4.com/info/press/news/channel-4-dispatches-defeats-injunction-attempt-by-viagogo
  4. CMSC (Culture, Media and Sport Committee), 2008, Ticket Touting: Second Report of Session 2007–08
  5. CMSC (Culture, Media and Sport Committee), 2016, Oral Evidence: Ticket Abuse, HC 823, 15 November 2016
  6. CMSC (Culture, Media and Sport Committee), 2017, Oral Evidence: Ticket Abuse, HC 823, 21 March 2017
  7. DCMS (Department of Culture, Media and Sport). 2007. “Tougher Protection for Ticket Buyers.” DCMS Press Release, July 22.
  8. DCMS (Department of Culture, Media and Sport), 2009, Consultation on Ticketing and Ticket Touting
  9. DCMS (Department of Culture, Media and Sport), 2010, Consultation on Ticketing and Ticket Touting 19 February–15 May Summary of Responses and Government Response
  10. Frith S., 2015, The Routledge Reader on the Sociology of Music, 269
  11. Frith S., 2013, The History of Live Music in Britain, Volume 1: From Dance Hall to the 100 Club
  12. Labour Party, 1997, Labour’s Sporting Nation
  13. Live Nation Entertainment, 2016, Annual Report 2015
  14. Live Nation Entertainment, 2017, Live Nation Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2016 Results
  15. Metropolitan Police, 2013, Ticket Crime: Problem Profile
  16. Office of Fair Trading, 2005, Ticket Agents in the UK
  17. Page W., 2009, Adding up the Music Industry for 2008
  18. UK Music, 2016, Measuring Music 2016 Report
  19. UK Music, 2017, Measuring Music 2017 Report
  20. UK Parliament, 2017, The Digital Economy Act 2017 (Chapter 30)
  21. UK Parliament, 2015, Consumer Rights Act 2015 (Chapter 5)
  22. Ward P., 2010, Ticket Touting
  23. Watson A., 2016, The Production and Consumption of Music in the Digital Age, 11

Metadata

Authors
Behr, A., & Cloonan, M.
Affiliations
  • International Centre for Music Studies (ICMuS) – School of Arts and Cultures, Newcastle University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK
  • Turku Institute for Advanced Studies, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
Venue
International Journal of Cultural Policy
Published
2018-01-30
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
95-108
ISSN
  • 1028-6632
  • 1477-2833
Cited by
10
References
20
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Going spare? Concert tickets, touting and cultural value. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10286632.2018.1431224
The paper
Behr, A., & Cloonan, M. (2020). Going spare? Concert tickets, touting and cultural value. International Journal of Cultural Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2018.1431224

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.