The Development and Use of an Instrument to Investigate Science Teachers’ Views on Indigenous Knowledge
Abstract
Science teachers in South Africa and globally experience difficulties with the integration of indigenous knowledge into their science lessons—a requirement of many science curricula. One of the reasons for this may relate to the views teachers hold about indigenous knowledge. Such views can form a barrier against successful inclusion of indigenous knowledge in the science classroom. It was, therefore, deemed useful to investigate teachers’ views on indigenous knowledge. This article reports on the development of a theoretical framework, and a questionnaire derived from it, to investigate teachers’ views on indigenous knowledge. The researchers were informed by the framework developed by Lederman, Abd-El-Khalick, Bell and Schwartz regarding the nature of science (NOS) and their views-on-the-NOS questionnaire. A qualitative study was done to develop and validate the views-on-the-nature-of-indigenous-knowledge instrument (VNOIK). The findings indicate that the VNOIK instrument is suitable to determine a wide range of views of science teachers on the nature of indigenous knowledge. We found that South African science teachers held mainly a partially informed view on the nature of indigenous knowledge. The new instrument can be used to measure the effect of a short learning programme and to identify further development needs of science teachers in addressing the tenets of science and indigenous knowledge effectively in the classroom.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Incorporating IKS into science teaching supports the development of students' conceptual understanding.
“and supports the development of students’ conceptual understanding”
From A Systematic Review of Pedagogical Practices for Integrating Indigenous Knowledge Systems in Science Teaching (2024) · cites this paper as Cronje et al., 2015
The views-on-the-nature-of-indigenous-knowledge (VNOIK) questionnaire determines teachers' understandings of the nature of indigenous knowledge and its alignment to the tenets of science.
“The views-on-the-nature-of-indigenous-knowledge (VNOIK) questionnaire (Cronje et al. 2015) determines teachers' understandings of the nature of indigenous knowledge, and its alignment to the tenets of science.”
From Insights provided into the decolonisation of the science curriculum, and teaching and learning of indigenous knowledge, using Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (2021) · cites this paper as Cronje et al. 2015
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Elaborating Indigenous Knowledge in the Science Curriculum for the Cultural Sustainability
Handayani, R. D., Wilujeng, I., & Prasetyo, Z. K. (2018) · Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability · doi:10.2478/jtes-2018-0016 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Ogegbo, A. A., & Ramnarain, U. (2024) · African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education · doi:10.1080/18117295.2024.2374133 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“…them to value and preserve the Indigenous knowledge (Handayani et al., 2018), demysti fi es science as ‘ it becomes grounded in local knowledge and students ’ experiences ’ (Mavuru & Ramnarain, 2017: 3) and supports the development of students ’ conceptual understanding (Cronje et al., 2015).”
de Beer, J. J., & Kriek, J. (2021) · South African Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.20853/35-6-4217 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cronje, A., de Beer, J., & Ankiewicz, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Johannesburg (ZA)
- ORCID
- Ankiewicz, Piet
- Venue
- African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-09-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 319-332
- ISSN
- 1028-8457 (ISSN-L)
- 1811-7295
- 2469-7656
- OpenAlex
- W2181908309
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 15.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- African Journal of Research in Mathematics Science and Technology Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Science Education and Perceptions
- Keywords
- indigenous knowledge, science teachers' views, instrument development, nature of science, teacher beliefs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review