The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“When perhaps the real problem is money itself!”: the practical materiality of Bitcoin
Open accessAbstract
This paper investigates the semiotics of Bitcoin, an electronic cash system that uses decentralized networking to enable irreversible payments. For enthusiasts, Bitcoin provides an alternative to currencies and payment systems that are seen to threaten users' privacy, limit personal liberty, and undermine the value of money through state and corporate oversight. Bitcoin's promise lies in its apparent capacity to resolve these concerns not through regulatory institutions or interpersonal trust, but through its cryptographic protocols. We characterize this semiotics as a “practical materialism” and suggest it replays debates about privacy, labor, and value.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Indeed, as we have previously argued (Maurer et al., 2013), the discourse around Bitcoin suggests a shared belief that the value of a commodityin this case, a cryptographic one-forms the basis for a shared economy and, thus, community.”
From Social Payments: Innovation, Trust, Bitcoin, and the Sharing Economy (2018) · cites this paper as Maurer et al., 2013
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Ultimately, in early bitcoin, ' trust in the code does not erase entirely the community that bestows it '”
From In Digital We Trust: Bitcoin Discourse, Digital Currencies, and Decentralized Network Fetishism (2018) · cites this paper as Maurer et al., 2013
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Maurer et al. consider that bitcoin represents a promise like any other money form, ' but a promise underwritten and backed by an algorithm and its manifestation in a digital peer-to-peer network '”
From In Digital We Trust: Bitcoin Discourse, Digital Currencies, and Decentralized Network Fetishism (2018) · cites this paper as Maurer et al., 2013
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For them, this is a trust in the code that ' substitutes for the (socially and politically constituted) credibility of persons, institutions, and governments. It is this -not the anonymity or the cryptography or the economics -that makes Bitcoin novel in the long conversation about the nature of money '”
From In Digital We Trust: Bitcoin Discourse, Digital Currencies, and Decentralized Network Fetishism (2018) · cites this paper as Maurer et al., 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Warren, S. D., & Brandeis, L. D. (1890) · University of Washington Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780295803661-014 · Cited by 4,092
Harvard Civil Rights: Civil Liberties Law Review
Alday, R. E. (1993) · Derechos y libertades: Revista de Filosofía del Derecho y derechos humanos · Cited by 1,436
Pocock, J. G. A. (1985) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511720505 · Cited by 1,419
Prophecy and the near future: Thoughts on macroeconomic, evangelical, and punctuated time
Guyer, J. I. (2007) · American Ethnologist · doi:10.1525/ae.2007.34.3.409 · Cited by 834
Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software
Kelty, C. M. (2008) · doi:10.2307/j.ctv1198vx9 · Cited by 774
Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-2158 · Cited by 709
Maurer, B. (2006) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123127 · Cited by 544
Self-citationPocock, J. G. A. (1985) · Cited by 498
Heads or Tails? Two Sides of the Coin
Hart, K. (1986) · Man · doi:10.2307/2802901 · Cited by 299
Blanchette, J. (2011) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21542 · Cited by 217
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2005.tb00345.x · DOI
- Ingham G., 2004, Credit and state theory of money, 173
- Maurer B., 2011, The European Electronic Newsletter, 12, 5
- Noizat , P. 2012 . Bitcoin: A universal complementary currency? ParisTech Review , January 20 . http://www.paristechreview.com/2012/01/20/bitcoin-universal-complementary-currency/ .
- 10.2307/1321160 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cheah, J. E., & Fry, J. M. (2015) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2015.02.029 · Cited by 1,386
Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age
Constantinides, P., Henfridsson, O., & Parker, G. G. (2018) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2018.0794 · Cited by 943
Hawlitschek, F., Notheisen, B., & Teubner, T. (2018) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2018.03.005 · Cited by 768
Price Fluctuations and the Use of Bitcoin: An Empirical Inquiry
Polasik, M., Piotrowska, A. I., Wisniewski, T. P., Kotkowski, R., & Lightfoot, G. (2015) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2016.1061413 · Cited by 418
Blockchain as a confidence machine: The problem of trust & challenges of governance
De Filippi, P., Mannan, M., & Reijers, W. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101284 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Maurer, B., Nelms, T. C., & Swartz, L.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Maurer, Bill
- Venue
- Social Semiotics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 261-277
- ISSN
- 1035-0330 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1219
- OpenAlex
- W1993755359
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 319.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- escholarship.org
- Locations
- Social Semiotics (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0960423)
- University of California, Irvine
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Semiotics and Representation Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Social Sciences › Communication › Cultural Studies and Postmodernism
- Keywords
- Bitcoin, semiotics, practical materialism, electronic money, decentralized networks, cryptographic protocols, privacy, money, values, labor, alternative currencies, payment systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
