The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The development, reliability, and validity of the revised creative product semantic scale
Abstract
: The Creative Product Semantic Scale (CPSS) is based on a theoretical model which conceptualizes three dimensions of product attributes: Novelty, Resolution, and Elaboration and Synthesis. The revision of the CPSS is described in the present article. Study 1 confirmed that the instrument could detect differences in the level of Novelty of three commercially available household products varying in unusualness. Study 2 was designed to validate the three dimensions of product attributes by testing whether or not the rankings of experts would agree with those of lay judges. Results indicated that judgments of Novelty made by naive judges were consistent with those of experts. The validity of Novelty, and to a lesser degree, that of Elaboration and Synthesis, were verified by Study 2. The validity of Resolution is yet to be established (no significant differences among products were observed). In both studies, Novelty and Resolution were independent, but Elaboration and Synthesis subscales migrated between loading with Novelty and Resolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique.
Amabile, T. M. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997 · Cited by 2,278
Cited by
Runco, M. A. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141502 · Cited by 994
Judgments of originality and appropriateness as predictors of creativity
Runco, M. A., & Charles, R. E. (1993) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(93)90337-3 · Cited by 309
Can artificial intelligence support creativity in early design processes?
Chandrasekera, T., Hosseini, Z., & Perera, U. (2025) · International Journal of Architectural Computing · doi:10.1177/14780771241254637 · Cited by 140
Toward a Meta-Theory of Creativity Forms: How Novelty and Usefulness Shape Creativity
Harvey, S., & Berry, J. W. (2023) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2020.0110 · Cited by 125
Perception of AI creativity: dimensional exploration and scale development
Yang, Y., & Xu, H. (2025) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.70028 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Quin, K., & Besemer, S. P.
- Venue
- Creativity Research Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1989-09
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 267-278
- ISSN
- 1040-0419 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6934
- OpenAlex
- W1986608136
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The development, reliability, and validity of the revised creative product semantic scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10400418909534323
- The paper
- O'Quin, K., & Besemer, S. P. (1989). The development, reliability, and validity of the revised creative product semantic scale. Creativity Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400418909534323
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
