Cited by 309Creativity in Education and NeuroscienceDesign Education and PracticeAesthetic Perception and Analysis

Judgments of originality and appropriateness as predictors of creativity

Runco, Mark A., Charles, Robyn E.·1993·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0191-8869(93)90337-3

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The definitions of overall creativity and its subcomponents originality and usefulness used as the rating rubric come from prior work.

    “They were provided with a rubric with our definitions of overall creativity and its two canonical subcomponents: originality and usefulnessb[22].”

    From The Role of Human Agency in Human-AI Co-Creativity (2026) · cites this paper as [22]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Runco, M. A., & Charles, R. E.
Affiliations
California State University, Fullerton (US)
Corresponding author
Runco, Mark A.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-11
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
537-546
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007405091
Cited by
309
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 16
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Keywords
creativity, originality, appropriateness, divergent thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review