Cited by 30Diversity and Career in MedicineMedical Education and AdmissionsGlobal Health Workforce Issues

Medical school outcomes, primary care specialty choice, and practice in medically underserved areas by physician alumni of MEDPREP, a postbaccalaureate premedical program for underrepresented and disadvantaged students

Metz, Anneke M.·2017·Teaching and Learning in Medicine

Abstract

Problem Minorities continue to be underrepresented as physicians in medicine, and the United States currently has a number of medically underserved communities. MEDPREP, a postbaccalaureate medical school preparatory program for socioeconomically disadvantaged or underrepresented in medicine students, has a stated mission to increase the numbers of physicians from minority or disadvantaged backgrounds and physicians working with underserved populations. This study aims to determine how MEDPREP enhances U.S. physician diversity and practice within underserved communities. Intervention MEDPREP recruits disadvantaged and underrepresented in medicine students to complete a 2-year academic enhancement program that includes science coursework, standardized test preparation, study/time management training, and emphasis on professional development. Five hundred twenty-five disadvantaged or underrepresented students over 15 years completed MEDPREP and were tracked through entry into medical practice. Context MEDPREP accepts up to 36 students per year, with two thirds coming from the Midwest region and another 20% from nearby states in the South. Students complete science, test preparation, academic enhancement, and professionalism coursework taught predominantly by MEDPREP faculty on the Southern Illinois University Carbondale campus. Students apply broadly to medical schools in the region and nation but are also offered direct entry into our School of Medicine upon meeting articulati…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10401334.2016.1275970

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Authors
Metz, A. M.
Affiliations
Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
Corresponding author
Metz, Anneke M.
Venue
Teaching and Learning in Medicine
Published
2017-03-02
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
351-359
ISSN
  • 1040-1334 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-8015
OpenAlex
W2736910767
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Teaching and Learning in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
Keywords
underrepresented minority students, disadvantaged students, medically underserved areas, medical school admissions, Southern Illinois University Carbondale
MeSH terms
Adult, Career Choice, Education, Medical, Graduate, Female, Humans, Illinois, Interviews as Topic, Male, Medically Underserved Area, Middle Aged, Minority Groups, Primary Health Care, Schools, Medical, Students, Medical, United States, Program Evaluation, Vulnerable Populations, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review