Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 167

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Extended‐matching items: A practical alternative to free‐response questions

Case, Susan M., Swanson, David B.·1993·Teaching and Learning in Medicine

Abstract

This article describes an item format, termed extended matching, that is currently used for the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE). Extended‐matching items are organized in sets that include several items with a single option list. In one common form of extended‐matching items, each item in a set describes a patient with the same chief complaint and requires the examinee to select the most likely diagnosis from a list of diagnoses associated with that chief complaint. This article outlines procedures for writing and reviewing these items, discusses the test development and psychometric advantages of the format, and reviews practical issues that arise in test administration and scoring. If items provide fairly detailed descriptions of patient situations and require examinees to make a diagnosis or specify the next step in patient care, the extended‐matching format can be used to challenge important clinical decision‐making skills. With its long option list, the format provides a good compromise between free‐response questions and traditional five‐option multiple‐choice items.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10401339309539601

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 167

Metadata

Authors
Case, S. M., & Swanson, D. B.
Venue
Teaching and Learning in Medicine
Published
1993-01
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
107-115
ISSN
  • 1040-1334 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-8015
OpenAlex
W2137582326
Cited by
167
References
0
FWCI
6.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extended‐matching items: A practical alternative to free‐response questions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10401339309539601
The paper
Case, S. M., & Swanson, D. B. (1993). Extended‐matching items: A practical alternative to free‐response questions. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401339309539601

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.