The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review on Solid Phase Micro Extraction—High Performance Liquid Chromatography (SPME-HPLC) Analysis of Pesticides
Open accessAbstract
Pesticides are an important and diverse environmental and agricultural species. Their determination in formulations, in feed and food, and in complex environmental matrices (e.g., water, soil, sludge, sediments, etc.) often requires separation methods capable of high efficiency, unique selectivity, and high sensitivity. Because pesticides (organophosporus, organochlorine, carbamate, dithiocarbamate, etc.) are carcinogenic, they are problematic for humans in the course of the food chain. Residual analyses have been performed to find out the concentration and type of pesticides and their metabolites left in food at the time of consumption. This ultimately helps in production of better and human-friendly pesticides. A new and effective sampling technique, Solid-Phase microextraction (SPME), was developed in 1990 using a fused silica fiber coated on the outside with appropriate stationary phase in which analyte in the sample is directly extracted to the fibber coating. Two types of fiber techniques can be used to extract analytes: Headspace (HS-SPME), where the fiber is exposed to the vapor phase above a gas, and direct immersion (DI-SPME), where the fiber is directly immersed in the samples. More advanced in-tube SPME recently has been developed, which uses open tubular fused-silica capillary column instead of SPME fiber. SPME in combination with HPLC, GC, GC-MS, LC-MS is getting a wide acceptability as an analytical technique. These have great advantages over the classical sampling techniques, which are time consuming and require larger samples and solvents. This review discusses the various advantages and disadvantages of the SPME for the extraction of the pesticides and their analysis by HPLC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Solid Phase Microextraction Coupled to High-Performance Liquid Chromatography
Chen, J., & Pawliszyn, J. B. (1995) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac00111a006 · Cited by 310
Falqui-Cao, C., Wang, Z., Urruty, L., Pommier, J.-J., & Montury, M. (2001) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf010519u · Cited by 91
Cited by
Cui, X.-Y., Gu, Z.-Y., Jiang, D.-Q., Li, Y., Wang, H.-F., & Yan, X.-P. (2009) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac901663x · Cited by 381
Sample preparation techniques for the determination of trace residues and contaminants in foods
Ridgway, K., Lalljie, S. P. D., & Smith, R. M. (2007) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.01.134 · Cited by 354
A comprehensive look at solid-phase microextraction technique: A review of reviews
Jalili, V., Barkhordari, A., & Ghiasvand, A. (2020) · Microchemical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.microc.2019.104319 · Cited by 317
Raynie, D. E. (2004) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac040117w · Cited by 195
Benedé, J. L., Chisvert, A., Giokas, D. L., & Salvador, A. (2014) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2014.08.024 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Aulakh, J. S., Malik, A. K., Kaur, V., & Schmitt-Kopplin, P.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-85
- ISSN
- 1040-8347 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-6510
- OpenAlex
- W1963635488
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review on Solid Phase Micro Extraction—High Performance Liquid Chromatography (SPME-HPLC) Analysis of Pesticides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10408340590947952
- The paper
- Aulakh, J. S., Malik, A. K., Kaur, V., & Schmitt-Kopplin, P. (2005). A Review on Solid Phase Micro Extraction—High Performance Liquid Chromatography (SPME-HPLC) Analysis of Pesticides. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408340590947952
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.