The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Review on the Fate of Pesticides during the Processes within the Food-Production Chain
Abstract
Only the intake of toxicologically-significant amounts can lead to adverse health effects even for a relatively toxic substance. In the case of residues in foods this is based on two major aspects--first, how to determine quantitatively the presence of a pollutant in individual foods and diets, including its fate during the processes within the food production chain; and second, how to determine the consumption patterns of the individual foods containing the relevant pollutants. The techniques used for the evaluation of the fate of pesticides during food processing have been critically reviewed in this paper to determine those areas where improvements are needed or desirable. Options for improvements are being suggested, including, for example, the development of a pan-European food composition database, activities to understand better effects of processing on individual food pesticides, and harmonization of food consumption survey methods with the option of a regular pan-European survey. The ultimate aim is to obtain appropriate estimations for the presence and quantity of a given chemical in a food and in the diet in general. Existing pragmatic approaches are a first crude step to model food pollutant intake. It is recommended to extend, refine, and validate this approach in the near future. This has to result in a cost-effective exposure-assessment system to be used for existing and potential categories of pollutants. This system of knowledge (with information on sensitivities, accuracy, etc.) will guide future data collection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Luo, Y., Guo, W., Ngo, H. H., Nghiem, L. D., Hai, F. I., Zhang, J., Liang, S., & Wang, X. C. (2014) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.065 · Cited by 3,983
Pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables from the Aegean region, Turkey
Bakırcı, G. T., Yaman Acay, D. B., Bakırcı, F., & Ötleş, S. (2014) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.02.051 · Cited by 302
New insights into the degradation of synthetic pollutants in contaminated environments
Bhatt, P., Gangola, S., Bhandari, G., Zhang, W., Maithani, D., Mishra, S., & Chen, S. (2021) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128827 · Cited by 283
Ozone as a novel emerging technology for the dissipation of pesticide residues in foods–a review
Pandiselvam, R., Kaavya, R., Jayanath, Y., Veenuttranon, K., Lueprasitsakul, P., Divya, V., Kothakota, A., & Ramesh, S. V. (2020) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2019.12.017 · Cited by 243
Metadata
- Authors
- González-Rodríguez, R. M., Rial-Otero, R., Cancho-Grande, B., Gonzalez-Barreiro, C., & Simal-Gándara, J.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-01-31
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 99-114
- ISSN
- 1040-8398 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7852
- OpenAlex
- W1996170849
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review on the Fate of Pesticides during the Processes within the Food-Production Chain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10408390903432625
- The paper
- González-Rodríguez, R. M., Rial-Otero, R., Cancho-Grande, B., Gonzalez-Barreiro, C., & Simal-Gándara, J. (2011). A Review on the Fate of Pesticides during the Processes within the Food-Production Chain. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408390903432625
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.