The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intake of Added Sugars and Selected Nutrients in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003—2006
Abstract
In the Institute of Medicine (IOM) macronutrient report the Committee recommended a maximal intake of < or = 25% of energy from added sugars. The primary objectives of this study were to utilize National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to update the reference table data on intake of added sugars from the IOM report and compute food sources of added sugars. We combined data from NHANES with the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) MyPyramid Equivalents Database (MPED) and calculated individual added sugars intake as percent of total energy then classified individuals into 8 added sugars percent energy categories, calculated usual intake with the National Cancer Institute (NCI) method, and compared intakes to the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs). Nutrients at most risk for inadequacy based on the Estimated Average Requirements (EARs) were vitamins E, A, C, and magnesium. Nutrient intake was less with each 5% increase in added sugars intake above 5-10%. Thirteen percent of the population had added sugars intake > 25%. The mean g-eq added sugars intake of 83.1 g-eq/day and added sugars food sources were comparable to the mid-1990s. Higher added sugars intakes were associated with higher proportions of individuals with nutrient intakes below the EAR, but the overall high calorie and the low quality of the U.S. diet remained the predominant issue. With over 80% of the population at risk for select nutrient inadequacy, guidance may need to focus on targeted healthful diet communication to reach the highest risk demographic groups for specific life stage nutrient inadequacies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metropolis, N., & Ulam, S. (1949) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1949.10483310 · Cited by 6,474
Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Vartanian, L. R., Schwartz, M. B., & Brownell, K. D. (2007) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2005.083782 · Cited by 1,863
Water-soluble dietary fibers and cardiovascular disease
Theuwissen, E., & Mensink, R. P. (2008) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.01.001 · Cited by 488
Food sources of added sweeteners in the diets of Americans.
GUTHRIE, J. F., & MORTON, J. F. (2000) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(00)00018-3 · Cited by 451
Keller, K. L., Kirzner, J., Pietrobelli, A., St-Onge, M.-P., & Faith, M. S. (2009) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/j.jada.2008.11.030 · Cited by 102
Cited by
Martínez Steele, E., Baraldi, L. G., Louzada, M. L. D. C., Moubarac, J.-C., Mozaffarian, D., & Monteiro, C. A. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009892 · Cited by 838
Sugar consumption, metabolic disease and obesity: The state of the controversy
Stanhope, K. L. (2016) · Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences · doi:10.3109/10408363.2015.1084990 · Cited by 739
CODEX-aligned dietary fiber definitions help to bridge the ‘fiber gap’
Jones, J. M. (2014) · Nutrition Journal · doi:10.1186/1475-2891-13-34 · Cited by 422
Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: use of nutritive and nonnutritive sweeteners
Fitch, C., & Keim, K. S. (2012) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jand.2012.03.009 · Cited by 373
Ruiz-Núñez, B., Pruimboom, L., Dijck-Brouwer, D. A. J., & Muskiet, F. A. J. (2013) · The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jnutbio.2013.02.009 · Cited by 246
Metadata
- Authors
- Marriott, B. P., Olsho, L., Hadden, L., & Connor, P.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-03-08
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 228-258
- ISSN
- 1040-8398 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7852
- OpenAlex
- W1976865835
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 22.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.