The DOI matches its Crossref record; 122 of the 122 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Update on the Chemopreventive Effects of Ginger and its Phytochemicals
Abstract
The rhizomes of Zingiber officinale Roscoe (Zingiberaceae), commonly known as ginger, is one of the most widely used spice and condiment. It is also an integral part of many traditional medicines and has been extensively used in Chinese, Ayurvedic, Tibb-Unani, Srilankan, Arabic, and African traditional medicines, since antiquity, for many unrelated human ailments including common colds, fever, sore throats, vomiting, motion sickness, gastrointestinal complications, indigestion, constipation, arthritis, rheumatism, sprains, muscular aches, pains, cramps, hypertension, dementia, fever, infectious diseases, and helminthiasis. The putative active compounds are nonvolatile pungent principles, namely gingerols, shogaols, paradols, and zingerone. These compounds are some of the extensively studied phytochemicals and account for the antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antiemetic, and gastroprotective activities. A number of preclinical investigations with a wide variety of assay systems and carcinogens have shown that ginger and its compounds possess chemopreventive and antineoplastic effects. A number of mechanisms have been observed to be involved in the chemopreventive effects of ginger. The cancer preventive activities of ginger are supposed to be mainly due to free radical scavenging, antioxidant pathways, alteration of gene expressions, and induction of apoptosis, all of which contribute towards decrease in tumor initiation, promotion, and progression. This review provides concise information from preclinical studies with both cell culture models and relevant animal studies by focusing on the mechanisms responsible for the chemopreventive action. The conclusion describes directions for future research to establish its activity and utility as a human cancer preventive and therapeutic drug. The above-mentioned mechanisms of ginger seem to be promising for cancer prevention; however, further clinical studies are warranted to assess the efficacy and safety of ginger.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Nigam, N., George, J., Srivastava, S., et al. (2009) · Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00280-009-1074-x · Cited by 76
RetractedGlobal Cancer Statistics, 2002
Parkin, D. M., Bray, F., Ferlay, J., & Pisani, P. (2005) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74 · Cited by 18,196
Arzneimittelforschung: Erstanwendung am Menschen in der Phase I
Miletzki, B., & Gleiter, C. H. (2005) · Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforsch.Gesundheitsschutz · doi:10.1007/s00103-005-1024-7 · Cited by 9,355
Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Ward, E., Murray, T., Xu, J., & Thun, M. J. (2007) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.57.1.43 · Cited by 7,439
Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-5024 · Cited by 5,350
The Causes of Cancer: Quantitative Estimates of Avoidable Risks of Cancer in the United States Today
Doll, R., & Peto, R. (1981) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/66.6.1192 · Cited by 3,927 · cited 1×
“Pioneering population-based studies by Doll and Peto (1981) showed that 75% to 80% of all cancers diagnosed could be avoided by altering lifestyle factors, such as smoking and diet.”
MethodThe Causes of Cancer: Quantitative Estimates of Avoidable Risks of Cancer in the United States Today
Peto, R. (1983) · The Use of Human Cells for the Evaluation of Risk from Physical and Chemical Agents · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-1117-2_30 · Cited by 3,501
Cancer chemoprevention with dietary phytochemicals
Surh, Y.-J. (2003) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1189 · Cited by 2,955
Molecular targets of dietary agents for prevention and therapy of cancer
Aggarwal, B. B., & Shishodia, S. (2006) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2006.02.009 · Cited by 1,754
Lazcano-Ponce, E. C. (2009) · Salud Pública de México · Cited by 1,669
Cited by
Gingerols and shogaols: Important nutraceutical principles from ginger
Semwal, R. B., Semwal, D. K., Combrinck, S., & Viljoen, A. M. (2015) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2015.07.012 · Cited by 607
Hu, Y., Amoah, A. N., Zhang, H., Fu, R., Qiu, Y., Cao, Y., Sun, Y., Chen, H., Liu, Y., & Lyu, Q. (2022) · The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.1080/14767058.2020.1712714 · Cited by 53
Lu, C., Chen, X., Yan, X., He, J., & Nie, Z. (2022) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104094 · Cited by 34
Ginger for treating nausea and vomiting: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Li, Z., Wu, J., Song, J., & Wen, Y. (2024) · International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/09637486.2023.2284647 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Baliga, M. S., Haniadka, R., Pereira, M. M., D’Souza, J. J., Pallaty, P. L., Bhat, H. P., & Popuri, S.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 499-523
- ISSN
- 1040-8398 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7852
- OpenAlex
- W2171010297
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 122
- FWCI
- 13.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Update on the Chemopreventive Effects of Ginger and its Phytochemicals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10408391003698669
- The paper
- Baliga, M. S., Haniadka, R., Pereira, M. M., D’Souza, J. J., Pallaty, P. L., Bhat, H. P., & Popuri, S. (2011). Update on the Chemopreventive Effects of Ginger and its Phytochemicals. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408391003698669
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.