The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interactions between Polyphenols and Macromolecules: Quantification Methods and Mechanisms
Abstract
Non-covalent and covalent associations of polyphenols with food macromolecules are two of the most fundamental factors affecting the quality of polyphenol-rich food products. This review therefore describes the biochemical bases of associations between polyphenols and macromolecules, that is, proteins and polysaccharides. Our intent is to provide a level of understanding that can be used to underpin future research directions. This will help to resolve existing issues that limit organoleptic and nutritional qualities of polyphenol-rich foods and drinks. It will also allow a better understanding of the functional consequences of these interactions on food/biological systems. The methods used to study non-covalent and covalent interactions are described, and the limiting factors of each method are emphasized. The biochemical mechanisms of interaction between polyphenols and macromolecules are also described. In processed food, non-covalent polyphenol/macromolecule interactions are largely due to weak associations, and result from a combination of hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions. The biochemical mechanisms for covalent interactions involve oxidation of phenolic compounds, whether enzymatically mediated or not, with the formation of o-quinones or o-semi-quinones, or the cleavage of procyanidin interflavanic bonds in acid medium with the formation of carbocations. The effects of factors such as polyphenol structure, macromolecule structure, relative concentrations of both polyphenol and macromolecule, solvent composition, ionic strength, temperature, and pH are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Influence of proline residues on protein conformation
MacArthur, M. W., & Thornton, J. M. (1991) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(91)90721-h · Cited by 1,189
Cited by
Polyphenols as active ingredients for cosmetic products
Zillich, O. V., Schweiggert‐Weisz, U., Eisner, P., & Kerscher, M. (2015) · International Journal of Cosmetic Science · doi:10.1111/ics.12218 · Cited by 343
Guo, Y., Bao, Y.-H., Sun, K.-F., Chang, C., & Liu, W.-F. (2021) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106293 · Cited by 223
Duan, W., Xia, T., Zhang, B., Li, S., Zhang, C., Zhao, C., Song, J., & Wang, M. (2019) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules24213935 · Cited by 40
Fuentes-Rios, D., Sanchez-Rodriguez, A., Lopez-Rios, L., Garcia-Gonzalez, E., Martinez-Canton, M., Galvan-Alvarez, V., Gallego-Selles, A., Martin-Rincon, M., Calbet, J. A. L., & Vega-Morales, T. (2025) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules30030461 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Le Bourvellec, C., & Renard, C. M. G. C.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 213-248
- ISSN
- 1040-8398 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7852
- OpenAlex
- W2020404336
- Cited by
- 853
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interactions between Polyphenols and Macromolecules: Quantification Methods and Mechanisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10408398.2010.499808
- The paper
- Le Bourvellec, C., & Renard, C. M. G. C. (2012). Interactions between Polyphenols and Macromolecules: Quantification Methods and Mechanisms. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2010.499808
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.