The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advances in Edible Coatings for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables: A Review
Abstract
Edible coatings are an environmentally friendly technology that is applied on many products to control moisture transfer, gas exchange or oxidation processes. Edible coatings can provide an additional protective coating to produce and can also give the same effect as modified atmosphere storage in modifying internal gas composition. One major advantage of using edible films and coatings is that several active ingredients can be incorporated into the polymer matrix and consumed with the food, thus enhancing safety or even nutritional and sensory attributes. But, in some cases, edible coatings were not successful. The success of edible coatings for fresh products totally depends on the control of internal gas composition. Quality criteria for fruits and vegetables coated with edible films must be determined carefully and the quality parameters must be monitored throughout the storage period. Color change, firmness loss, ethanol fermentation, decay ratio and weight loss of edible film coated fruits need to be monitored. This review discusses the use of different edible coatings (polysaccharides, proteins, lipids and composite) as carriers of functional ingredients on fresh fruits and vegetables to maximize their quality and shelf life. This also includes the recent advances in the incorporation of antimicrobials, texture enhancers and nutraceuticals to improve quality and functionality of fresh-cut fruits. Sensory implications, regulatory status and future trends are also reviewed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Essential oils: Their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods—A review
Burt, S. (2004) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.03.022 · Cited by 10,488
Lambert, R. J. W., Skandamis, P. N., Coote, P. J., & Nychas, G.-J. E. (2001) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01428.x · Cited by 2,449
Gutierrez, J., Barry-Ryan, C., & Bourke, P. (2008) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.02.028 · Cited by 925
Mechanical properties and biodegradation characteristics of PHB-based films
Savenkova, L., Gercberga, Z., Nikolaeva, V, Dzene, A., Bibers, I., & Kalnin, M. (2000) · Process Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0032-9592(99)00107-7 · Cited by 183
Cited by
Antifungal edible coatings for fresh citrus fruit: a review
Palou, L., Valencia-Chamorro, S., & Pérez-Gago, M. (2015) · Coatings · doi:10.3390/coatings5040962 · Cited by 185
Jongsri, P., Rojsitthisak, P., Wangsomboondee, T., & Seraypheap, K. (2017) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2017.06.011 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Dhall, R. K.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 435-450
- ISSN
- 1040-8398 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7852
- OpenAlex
- W2060678609
- Cited by
- 884
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 32.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advances in Edible Coatings for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10408398.2010.541568
- The paper
- Dhall, R. K. (2013). Advances in Edible Coatings for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables: A Review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2010.541568
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.