The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pre- and Postharvest Preventive Measures and Intervention Strategies to Control Microbial Food Safety Hazards of Fresh Leafy Vegetables
Abstract
This review includes an overview of the most important preventive measures along the farm to fork chain to prevent microbial contamination of leafy greens. It also includes the technological and managerial interventions related to primary production, postharvest handling, processing practices, distribution, and consumer handling to eliminate pathogens in leafy greens. When the microbiological risk is already present, preventive measures to limit actual contamination events or pathogen survival are considered intervention strategies. In codes of practice the focus is mainly put on explaining preventive measures. However, it is also important to establish more focused intervention strategies. This review is centered mainly on leafy vegetables as the commodity identified as the highest priority in terms of fresh produce microbial safety from a global perspective. There is no unique preventive measure or intervention strategy that could be applied at one point of the food chain. We should encourage growers of leafy greens to establish procedures based on the HACCP principles at the level of primary production. The traceability of leafy vegetables along the chain is an essential element in ensuring food safety. Thus, in dealing with the food safety issues associated with fresh produce it is clear that a multidisciplinary farm to fork strategy is required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nondestructive measurement of fruit and vegetable quality by means of NIR spectroscopy: A review
Nicolaï, B. M., Beullens, K., Bobelyn, E., Peirs, A., Saeys, W., Theron, K. I., & Lammertyn, J. (2007) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.06.024 · Cited by 2,252
Luning, P. A., Bango, L., Kussaga, J., Rovira, J., & Marcelis, W. J. (2008) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2008.03.005 · Cited by 159
Leifert, C., Ball, K., Volakakis, N., & Cooper, J. M. (2008) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03794.x · Cited by 70
Cited by
Balali, G. I., Yar, D. D., Afua Dela, V. G., & Adjei-Kusi, P. (2020) · International Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1155/2020/3029295 · Cited by 268
Microbial Contamination of Fresh Produce: What, Where, and How?
Machado‐Moreira, B., Richards, K., Brennan, F., Abram, F., & Burgess, C. M. (2019) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12487 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Gil, M. I., Selma, M. V., Suslow, T., Jacxsens, L., Uyttendaele, M., & Allende, A.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-10-22
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 453-468
- ISSN
- 1040-8398 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7852
- OpenAlex
- W1994243651
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pre- and Postharvest Preventive Measures and Intervention Strategies to Control Microbial Food Safety Hazards of Fresh Leafy Vegetables. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10408398.2012.657808
- The paper
- Gil, M. I., Selma, M. V., Suslow, T., Jacxsens, L., Uyttendaele, M., & Allende, A. (2015). Pre- and Postharvest Preventive Measures and Intervention Strategies to Control Microbial Food Safety Hazards of Fresh Leafy Vegetables. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2012.657808
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.