Cited by 165

Bioactive compounds, health benefits, and industrial applications of Tartary buckwheat ( Fagopyrum tataricum )

Zou, Liang, Wu, Dingtao, Ren, Guixing, Hu, Yichen, Peng, Lianxin, Zhao, Jianglin, Garcia-Perez, Pascual, Carpena, Maria +9 more·2023·Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition

Abstract

Tartary buckwheat belongs to the family Polygonaceae, which is a traditionally edible and medicinal plant. Due to its various bioactive compounds, the consumption of Tartary buckwheat is correlated to a wide range of health benefits, and increasing attention has been paid to its potential as a functional food. This review summarizes the main bioactive compounds and important bioactivities and health benefits of Tartary buckwheat, emphasizing its protective effects on metabolic diseases and relevant molecular mechanisms. Tartary buckwheat contains a wide range of bioactive compounds, such as flavonoids, phenolic acids, triterpenoids, phenylpropanoid glycosides, bioactive polysaccharides, and bioactive proteins and peptides, as well as D-chiro-inositol and its derivatives. Consumption of Tartary buckwheat and Tartary buckwheat-enriched products is linked to multiple health benefits, e.g. , antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antihyperlipidemic, anticancer, antidiabetic, antiobesity, antihypertensive, and hepatoprotective activities. Especially, clinical studies indicate that Tartary buckwheat exhibits remarkable antidiabetic activities. Various tartary buckwheat -based foods presenting major health benefits as fat and blood glucose-lowering agents have been commercialized. Additionally, to address the safety concerns, i.e. , allergic reactions, heavy metal and mycotoxin contaminations, the quality control standards for Tartary buckwheat and its products should be drafted and comple…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10408398.2021.1952161

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

  • Oxidative Stress and Alcoholic Liver Disease

    Wu, D., & Cederbaum, A. (2009) · Seminars in Liver Disease · doi:10.1055/s-0029-1214370 · Cited by 342 · cited 1× · see citing works

    “…about 90% of consumed alcohol is metabolized in the liver by alcohol dehydrogenase, resulting in the production of acetaldehyde, superoxide ions, and hydrogen peroxide, which may covalently bind to lipids and proteins, resulting in denaturation and alcoholic fatty liver (Wu and Cederbaum 2009).”
    BackgroundSelf-citation

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Zou, L., Wu, D., Ren, G., Hu, Y., Peng, L., Zhao, J., Garcia-Perez, P., Carpena, M., Prieto, M. A., Cao, H., Cheng, K.-W., Wang, M., Simal-Gandara, J., John, O. D., Rengasamy, K. R. R., Zhao, G., & Xiao, J.
Affiliations
  • Key Laboratory of Coarse Cereal Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Sichuan Engineering & Technology Research Center of Coarse Cereal Industralization, School of Food and Biological Engineering, Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
  • Department of Analytical Chemistry and Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, University of Vigo - Ourense Campus, Ourense, Spain
  • Institute for Advanced Study, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
  • Functional Foods Research Group, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
  • Green Biotechnologies Research Centre of Excellence, University of Limpopo, Polokwane, Sovenga, South Africa
Venue
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Published
2021-07-19
Volume
63
Issue
5
Pages
657-673
ISSN
  • 1040-8398
  • 1549-7852
Cited by
165
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review