Cited by 42Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive PeptidesBiochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesProteins in Food Systems

A comprehensive database of cheese-derived bitter peptides and correlation to their physical properties

Open access
Kuhfeld, R. F., Eshpari, H., Atamer, Z., Dallas, D. C.·2024·Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition

Abstract

Bitterness is a common flavor attribute of aged cheese associated with the peptide fraction, but excessive levels are a defect leading to consumer rejection. Bitterness in cheese has been primarily associated with peptides that arise from the breakdown of casein. The last review of bitter peptides was published in 1992. This updated review compiled information about the bitter peptides published up to 2022. Our comprehensive search of the literature compiled 226 peptides associated with bitterness and cheese protein origins into a database (Supplemental Materials). The influences of a peptide's physical properties, such as molecular weight, average hydrophobicity, peptide length, number of prolines and the presence of hydrophobic amino acids in the peptide's terminus, were assessed for correlation with bitterness threshold values this assessment found that, among variables considered, higher molecular weight had the strongest correlation with higher bitterness among known peptides. Heatmaps of bitter peptides and their bitterness threshold values highlight β-casein as the primary source of known bitter peptides in cheese. This comprehensive database of cheese protein-derived bitter peptides and this discovery of the correlation of a peptide's physical properties to bitterness will aid future researchers in the identification and discovery of contributors to cheese bitterness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10408398.2023.2220792

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher glutamic acid content contributed to reduced bitterness in the cheese.

    “with the higher glutamic acid content contributing to reduced bitterness in the cheese (Kuhfeld et al., 2024).”

    From Impact of lactic acid bacteria coculture on the quality characteristics of goat cheese during ripening (2025) · cites this paper as Kuhfeld et al., 2024

    The Background discusses cheese bitterness in relation to bitter peptides and cheesemaking factors, but does not link higher glutamic acid content to reduced bitterness. A search for “glutamic” found a mention in Literature search correcting a peptide sequence, not a finding about glutamic acid content or bitterness in cheese. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Kelly, C. D. 1932. The influence of certain lactic acid streptococci on the chemical changes in cheddar cheese during ripening. New York State Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 200:3-28.
  2. Richardson, B. C., and L. K. Creamer. 1973. Casein proteolysis and bitter peptides in cheddar cheese. New Zealand Journal of Dairy Science and Technology 8:46-51.
  3. Stadhouders, J., and G. Hup. 1975. Factors affecting bitter flavor in gouda cheese. Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 29:335-53.
  4. Visser, S., K. J. Slangen, G. Hup, and J. Stadhouders. 1983. Bitter flavor in cheese.3. comparative gel-chromatographic analysis of hydrophobic pep- tide fractions from 12 gouda-type cheeses and identification of bitter peptides isolated from a cheese made with Streptococcus-cremoris strain hp. Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 37:181-92.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuhfeld, R. F., Eshpari, H., Atamer, Z., & Dallas, D. C.
Affiliations
Oregon State University (US)
Corresponding author
Kuhfeld, R. F.
Venue
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Published
2023-06-28
Volume
64
Issue
27
Pages
10105-10119
ISSN
  • 1040-8398 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7852
OpenAlex
W4382343928
Cited by
42
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
Keywords
cheese bitterness, bitter peptides, aged cheese, casein hydrolysis, β-casein, molecular weight, hydrophobicity, proline content, peptide database
MeSH terms
Caseins, Cheese, Humans, Molecular Weight, Peptides, Taste, Databases, Factual, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review