Cited by 197Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityComposting and Vermicomposting TechniquesWaste Management and Recycling

Utilizing Waste Products from the Food Production and Processing Industries

Russ, Winfried, Meyer-Pittroff, Roland·2004·Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition

Abstract

Waste in the food industry is characterized by a high ratio of product-specific waste. Not only does this mean that the generation of this waste is unavoidable, but also that the amount and kind of waste produced, which consists primarily of the organic residue of processed raw materials, can scarcely be altered if the quality of the finished product is to remain consistent. The utilization and disposal of product-specific waste is difficult, due to its inadequate biological stability, potentially pathogenic nature, high water content, potential for rapid autoxidation, and high level of enzymatic activity. The diverse types of waste generated by various branches of the food industry can be quantified based on each branches' respective level of production. Moreover; the origins of each type of waste and a tabulated overview of the traditional agricultural methods for reusing the waste are discussed. Additionally, alternative methods of waste management have emerged, which target the most important contents of the waste. In conclusion, new possibilities for the utilization of food industry waste are described.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10408690490263783

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the meat industry, the majority of the waste is produced during slaughtering and consists of various nonedible parts that are categorised as byproducts.

    “In the meat industry, the majority of the waste is produced during slaughtering and consists of various nonedible parts that are categorised as byproducts [87, 88].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 5 · Cited by 197

Authors
Russ, W., & Meyer-Pittroff, R.
Affiliations
Technical University of Munich (DE)
Venue
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Published
2004-01
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
57-62
ISSN
  • 1040-8398 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7852
OpenAlex
W2029433253
Cited by
197
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
Keywords
food industry waste, waste utilization, waste management, food by-products, organic residues, waste reuse, waste generation quantification, waste disposal, agricultural waste utilization
MeSH terms
Conservation of Natural Resources, Environmental Monitoring, Food-Processing Industry, Humans, Refuse Disposal, Waste Products, Water Pollution, Waste Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review