The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution, and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae)
Abstract
The coding region of the matK gene and two intergenic spacers, psb A‐trn H and trn L(UAA)‐trn F(GAA), of cpDNA were sequenced to study phylogenetic relationships of 32 Paeonia species. In the psbA‐trn H intergenic spacer, short sequences bordered by long inverted repeats have undergone inversions that are often homoplasious mutations. Insertions/deletions found in the two intergenic spacers, mostly resulting from slipped‐strand mispairing, provided relatively reliable phylogenetic information. The matK coding region, evolving more rapidly than the trn L‐trn F spacer and more slowly than the psbA‐trnH spacer, produced the best resolved phylogenetic tree. The matK phylogeny was compared with the phylogeny obtained from sequences of internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA. A refined hypothesis of species phylogeny of section Paeonia was proposed by considering the discordance between the nuclear and cpDNA phylogenies to be results of hybrid speciation followed by inheritance of cpDNA of one parent and fixation of ITS sequences of another parent. The Eurasian and western North American disjunct distribution of the genus may have resulted from interrruption of the continuous distribution of ancestral populations of extant peony species across the Bering land bridge during the Miocene. Pleistocene glaciation may have played an important role in triggering extensive reticulate evolution within section Paeonia and shifting distributional ranges of both parental and hybrid species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolution of Protein Molecules
JUKES, T. H., & CANTOR, C. R. (1969) · Mammalian Protein Metabolism · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7 · Cited by 11,032
Cited by
Utility of Low-Copy Nuclear Gene Sequences in Plant Phylogenetics
Sang, T. (2002) · Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1080/10409230290771474 · Cited by 357
Self-citationMetabolite Profiling and Classification of DNA-Authenticated Licorice Botanicals
Simmler, C., Anderson, J. R., Gauthier, L., Lankin, D. C., McAlpine, J. B., Chen, S.-N., & Pauli, G. F. (2015) · Journal of Natural Products · doi:10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b00342 · Cited by 50
Cellular base of mint allelopathy: Menthone affects plant microtubules
Sarheed, M. M., Rajabi, F., Kunert, M., Boland, W., Wetters, S., Miadowitz, K., Kaźmierczak, A., Sahi, V. P., & Nick, P. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.546345 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Sang, T., Crawford, D. J., & Stuessy, T. F.
- Venue
- American Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-08
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1120-1136
- ISSN
- 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2197
- OpenAlex
- W2130751261
- Cited by
- 1,458
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution, and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2446155
- The paper
- Sang, T., Crawford, D. J., & Stuessy, T. F. (1997). Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution, and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). American Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.2307/2446155
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.