Cited by 54Contact Dermatitis and AllergiesEssential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityInsect Pest Control Strategies

Skin Irritancy of Tea Tree Oil

Southwell, Ian A., Freeman, Susanne, Rubel, Diana·1997·Journal of Essential Oil Research

Abstract

The essential oil of Australian tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) has been investigated for skin irritancy using an occlusive patch test on 25 human subjects for 21 days. 1,8-Cineole, the constituent reported as being responsible for tea tree oil skin irritancy, was similarly tested. Irritancy was not detected from any of eight preparations containing pure cineole in concentrations of 0.0, 3.8, 8.0, 12.0, 16.0, 19-9, 24.0 and 28.1% in soft white paraffin. Eight tea tree oil preparations containing similar concentrations of cineole did not show skin irritation when tested at 25% in soft white paraffin. However, 3 of 28 panelists were withdrawn from the trial because of a severe allergic (as distinct from irritant) response to tea tree oil. These subjects were then tested with either pure tea tree oil major constituents or crude fractions. One panelist showed a strongly positive reaction to α-terpinene and all three reacted (two strongly) to two sesquiterpenoid fractions. None showed allergic response to α-pinene, β-pinene, limonene, p-cymene, 1,8-cineole, γ-terpinene, terpinolene, terpinen-4-ol or α-terpineol in 24-28 h. Three positive reactions occurred to a sesquiterpene hydrocarbon fraction, and one to a sesquiterpene alcohol fraction. The significance of these human tests with the topical application of tea tree oil products is discussed and methods for the minimization of allergens are suggested.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10412905.1997.9700713

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Southwell et al. study on skin irritancy of tea tree oil was classified as Level IV evidence and was limited by small sample size and lack of control group.

    “According to the Oxford evidence hierarchy, this study would fall under Level IV (case series, case‐control studies) as it involved human subjects and measured the effects of tea tree oil on their skin.”

    From Cosmeceuticals in photoaging: A review. (2024) · cites this paper as [20]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Southwell, I. A., Freeman, S., & Rubel, D.
Affiliations
Skin and Cancer Foundation (AU)
Venue
Journal of Essential Oil Research
Published
1997-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
47-52
ISSN
  • 1041-2905 (ISSN-L)
  • 2163-8152
OpenAlex
W2074223421
Cited by
54
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Essential Oil Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
Keywords
tea tree oil, Melaleuca alternifolia, skin irritation, 1,8-cineole, allergic contact dermatitis, sesquiterpenes, α-terpinene, sesquiterpene hydrocarbons, sesquiterpene alcohols, essential oil constituents, topical application

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review