Characteristics of a work organization from a Lean perspective
Abstract
:Implementation of lean practices results in significant changes in an organization. Current research in lean production primarily focuses on examining relationships between the implementation of lean production (LP) and the performance of the organization; however, there is a need to assess the implications of large-scale changes such as lean production on work design characteristics and employee outcomes. The purpose of this article is to study the impact of lean production on work design characteristics, such as autonomy, task identity and skill variety, and employee outcomes. This article proposes a conceptual framework that indicates key LP practices and their influences on work characteristics and employee outcomes.Current research in LP identifies transformations in lean models inspired by sociotechnical principles. This article presents a comprehensive literature review of an evaluation of LP based on sociotechnical design principles. This evaluation contributes toward developing an insight for the proposed framework of the work design characteristics in a lean environment. Finally, a causal loop diagram is used to derive theoretical implications of the conceptual framework proposed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The effects of Lean are contingent on how and where Lean is implemented.
“This has led researchers to propose that the effects of Lean are contingent on how and where Lean is implemented [33, 37, 41].”
From Lean Thinking in Emergency Departments: A Critical Review (2011) · cites this paper as [41]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 67
- Authors
- Mehta, V., & Shah, H.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Tech (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mehta, Vidhi
- Venue
- Engineering Management Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 14-20
- ISSN
- 1042-9247 (ISSN-L)
- 2377-0643
- OpenAlex
- W2071228479
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Engineering Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
- Keywords
- lean manufacturing, job design, job characteristics, employee autonomy, task identity, skill variety, employee outcomes, socio-technical design, lean implementation, organizational change, conceptual framework, causal loop diagrams
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review